From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ruozx-00028Q-FV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:38:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DBE0E078E; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F33AE0748 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957CB3DC06E for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:37:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=libertytrek.org; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= libertytrek.org; b=GFhTByb6DCzQOV6IqPHOhUKYTx4KFl0RcgYHIUK+gRRbf hGmKVE8Vz1CE+FpRS4KAa1dfqlxWcbEeM0K9ooL89HNI25M4kgBQa6H/zpmW6hFR 2sTUus9wrsyGsJn0ZoAYgvzlyYs8AsGOJdDwwGEcoUKoO1mLNUL067L0bUN35c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=libertytrek.org; h= message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= libertytrek.org; bh=NtmY26Sl17Q3CBmZMBr6jI5v3yE=; b=SRRu8Uy9MAyL g45UuMHvscxP3NJZFRmCSj3hR6BtYPl+SSh+K1zOL7yDoj54vt5OUZbrrW9AFq5/ NOHMJG3wZsxgZ4IWT9Q4+4GfLcEmP8T5LP5OGPRMpJ+3HQTa2mZjFYV6SoGrBjby 32dKlaLykAxltCQSQgKOFP2UiCRKifo= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (50-76-228-201-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.76.228.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 671DB3DC06D for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:37:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F316148.3030605@libertytrek.org> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:37:12 -0500 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] HEADS UP - postfix-2.9.0 is broken References: <1328526401.3021.0@numa-i> <4F300E14.4080108@xunil.at> <1436381.LRbWW7PalW@localhost> <20120207073612.GA3138@zptr-nb18.caf.local> In-Reply-To: <20120207073612.GA3138@zptr-nb18.caf.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 74ed3337-0e57-4a89-8c5d-98ecb315a2ad X-Archives-Hash: d4dfeba51491af847ca22b395aaa8e3e On 2012-02-07 2:36 AM, Eray Aslan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: >> Soooo... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ? > Yes, it should be OK as long as you run > etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar after the upgrade. I was concerned about this at first, but if this was indeed the cause of the OP and others' problem (as opposed to an actual bug in the ebuild), then they did it to themselves, because what you said - running etc-update (or dispatch-conf) is *always* required for packages like postfix.