From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-134624-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RuTin-00079c-Ld
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:55:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A0D2E07DB;
	Mon,  6 Feb 2012 18:54:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B309E0843
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Feb 2012 18:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5598320D46
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Feb 2012 13:52:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160])
  by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:52:33 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=binarywings.net;
	 h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=CwBZKnYECRL9SQnc3Gcf4o7K
	HWU=; b=TK5SrWV0KCZ5bwMjNL8oIN7OM3IdGzVczPjISd0i1wdGCDTutlyaHciZ
	fDyQTujeQ6socVy32dVIEoR+QZTFlOHsnv6uRaahqWqH4B2e1Dk3yFnTjcqTQar8
	tG2ECTZSTvwnwUA5vj+atALY5abqRiFuie0n+Hlm3Oxw2sktxGM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=CwBZ
	KnYECRL9SQnc3Gcf4o7KHWU=; b=SwqxGkoCMNoONj0pJWF1d7gK6AWzAQtTStXq
	ZuQJO3EEC0N9olQghYmhLBK0xICQCKnIy7CjmaFEM9vJ/VOuFfFhT95JywzLTikZ
	uNohJ/33hyUTLUoFH5ibHuhw+Wmz4+7qHSAPmeQ67BDZHOoQaCVe8D4uHIBul+c6
	azw0ASg=
X-Sasl-enc: w8V4xFwIzxbq0wIb+IFkmStvcov+KMEwDW7KfZXfI3yt 1328554352
Received: from [192.168.5.18] (serv.binarywings.net [83.169.5.6])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1FBC8E0153
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  6 Feb 2012 13:52:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4F302166.1080905@binarywings.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:52:22 +0100
From: Florian Philipp <lists@binarywings.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120114 Thunderbird/9.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] hwclock <--> sysclock and the ntp-client
References: <20120206175130.GA3145@solfire> <CA+czFiCsc+8WxWMUoTVCe=MMuqPsJzCPUBCh36XkaFsMy3cvsQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120206183916.GB3145@solfire>
In-Reply-To: <20120206183916.GB3145@solfire>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigFA2B55EEE2EA9E979EEA1A1B"
X-Archives-Salt: 5d50bc0a-c84d-47f0-b2c2-b90b41ccf82f
X-Archives-Hash: c5c25f87439ef4cf943ae980442166fd

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigFA2B55EEE2EA9E979EEA1A1B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 06.02.2012 19:39, schrieb meino.cramer@gmx.de:
> Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com> [12-02-06 19:20]:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM,  <meino.cramer@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> to get the correct system time I use ntp-client in the boot process.
>>> Furthermore in /etc/conf.d/hwclock I set:
>>>
>>>    # Set CLOCK to "UTC" if your Hardware Clock is set to UTC (also kn=
own as
>>>    # Greenwich Mean Time).  If that clock is set to the local time, t=
hen
>>>    # set CLOCK to "local".  Note that if you dual boot with Windows, =
then
>>>    # you should set it to "local".
>>>    clock=3D"UTC"
>>>
>>>    # If you want to set the Hardware Clock to the current System Time=

>>>    # (software clock) during shutdown, then say "YES" here.
>>>    # You normally don't need to do this if you run a ntp daemon.
>>>    clock_systohc=3D"YES"
>>>
>>>    # If you want to set the system time to the current hardware clock=

>>>    # during bootup, then say "YES" here. You do not need this if you =
are
>>>    # running a modern kernel with CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS set to y.
>>>    # Also, be aware that if you set this to "NO", the system time wil=
l
>>>    # never be saved to the hardware clock unless you set
>>>    # clock_systohc=3D"YES" above.
>>>    clock_hctosys=3D"NO"
>>>
>>>    # If you wish to pass any other arguments to hwclock during bootup=
,
>>>    # you may do so here. Alpha users may wish to use --arc or --srm h=
ere.
>>>    clock_args=3D""
>>>
>>> In the kernel config file I had set:
>>>
>>>    CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS=3Dy
>>>    CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE=3D"rtc0"
>>>
>>> I would exspect that after a reboot of the system which system time i=
s
>>> correctly set via ntp-client that the hwclock and system time only
>>> differ in a small amount of time.
>>>
>>> But:
>>> solfire:/home/mccramer>hwclock
>>> Mon Feb  6 19:05:11 2012  -0.172569 seconds
>>> solfire:/home/mccramer>date
>>> Mon Feb  6 18:49:37 CET 2012
>>> solfire:/home/mccramer>
>>
>> I don't know the CET tz, but I can see that the minutes don't match
>> up. I assume you rand the two commands within seconds of each other.
>> Is this true immediately after bootup, or does it take a while to get
>> that far off? It could be that your hardware clock is drifting, and
>> the system won't reset it until it goes to shutdown.
>>
>> --=20
>> :wq
>>
>=20
> Hi Michael,
> thank you for your reply.
> I set the configuration as mentioned above and booted twice with about
> five minutes wait.
> The commands were executed within seconds, yes.
> All hardware clocks drifts, but this is not the problem.
> The problem is that the hardware clock is not set to the system time
> in contradiction to what I think the comments in the config are=20
> saying.
>=20
> How can I fix that?
>=20
> Thank you very much in advance for any help!
> Best regards,
> mcc
>=20
>=20
>=20

Is your RTC driver compiled into the kernel? The "httosys" function of
the kernel takes place before any modules can be loaded and will fail if
your CMOS clock driver is a module.

Activating clock_hctosys in /etc/conf.d/hwclock should solve this as it
takes place later in the boot process.

Regards,
Florian Philipp


--------------enigFA2B55EEE2EA9E979EEA1A1B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8wIWsACgkQqs4uOUlOuU9gfwCfdWEJcIuehdPAP2CiLCRHiC0l
z3IAnjqjoOAj/z86y4L2ZjK8cKlC6eJK
=GZ12
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigFA2B55EEE2EA9E979EEA1A1B--