From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-134271-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1RrWze-0002E5-PZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:48:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B586E090B; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.alltele.net (smtp.alltele.net [85.30.0.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D31E08E8 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([87.227.57.71]) by smtp.alltele.net (IceWarp 10.3.6 (2011-12-14)) with ESMTP id NQY93603 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:47:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4F2569F8.7080306@coolmail.se> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:47:04 +0100 From: pk <peterk2@coolmail.se> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120116 Thunderbird/9.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Question regarding recent poppler down-/upgrade... References: <4F2541ED.2040002@coolmail.se> <20120129162324.00482fa8@khamul.example.con> In-Reply-To: <20120129162324.00482fa8@khamul.example.con> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.80 required=7.00 tests=LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.90,BAYES_20=-0.11,SMILEY=-0.50,NO_RDNS2=0.01,MR_DIFF_MID=0.50 version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (1.1) on smtp.alltele.net X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A0B020D.4F2569F9.003F,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" X-Spam-IndexStatus: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 97fdd907-3008-4af2-b5f3-d153c7cf8d96 X-Archives-Hash: 899eccf8b0c70b4d25b9200dc9b6b349 On 2012-01-29 15:23, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Yes indeed, someone screwed up. Either: > > The submitter pasted the wrong list of bugs into the report or > Forgot to mention that the bug number are not from b.g.o, but from some > other bugzilla > > The first one for example - 288045 - comes from bugs.kde.org meaning > the links are wrong Ok, so I'm not going loco then... great! :-) Thanks for looking it over! Best regards Peter K