From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-133271-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Ri5wN-00076i-8j
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:06:15 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF30421C05B;
	Tue,  3 Jan 2012 15:06:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2DD21C05B
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  3 Jan 2012 15:04:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yhjj52 with SMTP id j52so10712335yhj.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:04:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=CPlua1juamobp8CcD69ErcNEu7AecGVt+MVA7R2Cgo0=;
        b=exEku2BqApMb2GwKJ/P+Hd8JWE/efDOAFkCQDjXZYvc0vVafRloao2bdno0vhl9rPb
         Cg27Z6rb5+kr49Cptz6VaBTZeYcMHQ557I/20XB+yUOunTqvWGwkO2HNe7RjU65q6HXN
         /rXtRYn45mAZlmPtJXBVI/OjhpxJzVQqKmkQo=
Received: by 10.236.129.140 with SMTP id h12mr66398381yhi.47.1325603093694;
        Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-65-42.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.65.42])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c44sm74764178yhm.5.2012.01.03.07.04.51
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 03 Jan 2012 07:04:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F031911.7000907@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:04:49 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111022 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev;
 version 3
References: <20111115062115.GA3262@waltdnes.org> <20111121104724.GC7461@waltdnes.org> <20111201194544.GD4455@waltdnes.org> <20120103100445.GD1961@waltdnes.org> <CAA2qdGVZQdSLiPXwCiXxXAvMacwihqDjZ-wwL55V9dRVNnq+rA@mail.gmail.com> <20120103123209.GB2410@nicolas-desktop> <CAA2qdGX-Hubx0QzsRJSkwJtTqGcSpNADi=4s52_RbPOremSCLw@mail.gmail.com> <20120103131346.GC2410@nicolas-desktop> <CAA2qdGXWWZe_xVWWKAWAcfwhaQ9MxOfat0PDzCbiedRXvYd-kw@mail.gmail.com> <20120103143120.GF2410@nicolas-desktop> <20120103164317.51d681da@rohan.example.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120103164317.51d681da@rohan.example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 48b5635c-340f-449c-a826-84519ab97021
X-Archives-Hash: 070ea899b718cbec8d64dd5a4492a5fc

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:31:20 +0100
> Nicolas Sebrecht<nsebrecht@piing.fr>  wrote:
>
>>> Then again, using initramfs is yet-another-component waiting to
>>> break.
>>>
>>> Knowing Murphy's Law, it will one day fuck up everything.
>> And the mdev alternative won't follow this law?
>
> It's not immune to it, just statistically less likely to be affected.
>
> mdev sans initramfs is a less complex solution than udev plus
> initramfs. Ergo, all other things being equal, less bits to break.
>
>

Yep.  I *think* I got a init thingy to work but I'm still not sure and 
apparently since there was no replies to my other thread, no one else 
knows either.  From the messages in dmesg, it looks like I have tho.  
Thing is, if I reboot and the init fails, I have no real clue how to fix 
it.  I know this because I ran into this same thing on Mandriva, along 
with the dependency problems that is well known.  The fact that Gentoo 
has a simple booting process is what really got me interested in 
Gentoo.  If we are going down this road, I may check and see if the 
dependency problems are fixed.  As bad as it is to say, Gentoo is 
getting more like other distros that I left or didn't want to bother 
with.  Makes me wonder.  I know I am a unique old bird but I bet I am 
not alone in this.

It sort of comes down to this, if I can't boot because of a broken 
init*, I may just save my /home and data drive and install something else.

Just my $0.02 worth and it ain't worth more than that I'm sure.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"