From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RhsAi-0006e5-Km for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:24:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9BF621C028; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 00:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9305321C028 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 00:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnq2 with SMTP id q2so1291076ggn.40 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:22:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TvvDsTlWn5twIDYFaANSDOZLot/0fSGH7CIDDf4fatk=; b=G8E9N0yNg9bRc4po0/L6SXhAbHzXGnKrQv/Kumk1RiQg44zKtizyR3G86oIGLE6TM9 ECS8hYCDC5a6nf4LTnj/+tutSLU8Wm31/PYemomaktyXDLuN7WtxcsGmyj/2oKclHQSB fuKRlyOWtRjK4f4jBtCr1LR4cLnOgnNYc+2MU= Received: by 10.101.24.16 with SMTP id b16mr20111340anj.36.1325550173019; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:22:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-65-42.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.65.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v35sm12578128yhj.14.2012.01.02.16.22.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:22:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F024A58.7090106@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:22:48 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111022 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --update behavior References: <4F00D521.1030702@orlitzky.com> <4F00DA99.8050502@orlitzky.com> <4F00DEC5.5090500@gmail.com> <4F00E741.6050002@orlitzky.com> <4F01CED2.5090806@libertytrek.org> <4F01D6A2.9000002@orlitzky.com> <4F01DC67.7070305@orlitzky.com> <4F01EBBC.5020107@orlitzky.com> <4F01EF87.9030809@orlitzky.com> <20120102205018.5527e6ea@digimed.co.uk> <4F021CDC.7070607@orlitzky.com> <20120103012528.19782851@rohan.example.com> <4F02429E.3020106@orlitzky.com> <20120103000423.1ae0efad@hactar.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120103000423.1ae0efad@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 05d7fe63-db0e-40a2-bc5f-a654d072a6cc X-Archives-Hash: 1ebbe7534b1d4575d14eabd70f536f1e Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:49:50 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >>> And now finally we have Zac, a brave man who has taken on the >>> thankless task of sorting the mess out. Most of his deep changes over >>> the past two years or so are to make things consistent within the >>> overall grand plan. >>> >>> Stuff breaks badly when you do that. But it has to be done. Today it's >>> your turn to be on the sharp end. >> I'm fine with suffering a little for the greater good, but is the new >> behavior better in any tangible way? > It is reasonable to assume that the answer to that question is "yes". Any > other answer raises the question "why did Zac spend so much effort > recoding portage just to piss off the odd user?". > > I always knew I was "odd". Looks like I have some company tho. Welcome to the "odd user" group Michael. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"