From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-132809-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1ReOyw-0003cv-4W
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:37:38 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75E5F21C145;
Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:37:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30D621C128
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 10:36:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggnr5 with SMTP id r5so8105244ggn.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 02:36:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=jHao3uxNNQpCEZ/iP+wdOPK4oL3NuuKy0GByUih2sKY=;
b=h1nIQ/Zaio8BTzQ5a4WLi8QApbQnL39VxweGK/cmmmZh5eE1ddBPcGJQjR18r33/Zw
OXkEYPoTaBgL6Kenc9A6y3q081D8uO3RKgx/gqzys/5BugI60xvDZa+KUrdZ8USYGMG9
TIqJblEE95lU8/FWJqJTAsN+yWENkIMRyzbqI=
Received: by 10.101.144.6 with SMTP id w6mr7733256ann.18.1324722967404;
Sat, 24 Dec 2011 02:36:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-122-130.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.122.130])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j21sm40754180ann.0.2011.12.24.02.36.04
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 24 Dec 2011 02:36:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EF5AB12.1040702@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 04:36:02 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111022 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Video editing advice on formats and size of file
References: <4EF48DA6.1080203@gmail.com> <4EF49402.3000907@gmail.com> <4EF53040.5050503@gmail.com> <4EF54657.9090309@gmail.com> <CA+czFiDi0ArsLnE0as1LTd-KdrpwSf_GGSsz_KQG2=ij7kp0sg@mail.gmail.com> <4EF59350.3070601@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EF59350.3070601@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 1ad24686-a6d8-4557-b4e6-f0ff6bdf7613
X-Archives-Hash: f35eec1dc12962cb0b79360de2eb438d
Dale wrote:
>
> I been doing some testing on this. I went to about the end of a 3
> hour video. By the time it gets near the end of the video, the sound
> is almost 1.4 seconds off. I tested this by telling smplayer to
> adjust the audio delay. It is a bit annoying to see something on
> screen then hear it a second or so later. It's like seeing a
> explosion at a distance. You see it then have to wait for the sound
> wave to hit you. When I am midways of the video, it is about .6 to .7
> seconds off. So, it gets farther off as it goes. It's most likely
> one step off that just gets worse as it goes.
>
> I tried a couple other commands but I get errors about the file type.
> I think a couple movies are in flv1 which is old. I may have to
> convert them then stitch them together, which may not do the sound any
> good then either. lol
>
> Well, I got something to play with.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
Well, I tried to go to sleep and come back to this tomorrow. I couldn't
sleep so here I am again. While laying there I came up with a idea. I
stitched the first two videos together into a temporary file. Then I
stitched the temporary file to the 3rd video. The sound is off but it
sort of resets when it reached the stitch point so it is a good bit
closer than it was.
If I ever get me a video camera, I'm going to know to not break up
videos if I ever plan to put them back together again. It appears that
when you break the video, it is like humpty dumpty. You just can't
quite get it back together again.
At least this way is faster tho. Thanks to all for the ideas. I'm
still testing things.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
Miss the compile output? Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"