From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RaKsT-000684-Bg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:26:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D26121C145; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AF521C034 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.17.29.6] (unknown [65.213.236.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4881337AD8 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:24:53 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2; t=1323753893; bh=ng8bboPjpg4mADehiX7CagbvokasXWCRL/zXR3KT2/c=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=mzu/fKBXH5LR5Cceih/YYzXalmy6cN0VPbzcUhCOIKhbC7dxLKfUUWZSrgHQ/oMTF OI6MdtTofVGexlebwchfmYnvGvQcq2uiunJyIA8Eq0we6myc92D/zY+qR7urd9LGBp nCGe1RMGdeDnA40OyDl3S2DrvDD8SMKP8y1ksi4Y= Message-ID: <4EE6E1A2.9060205@orlitzky.com> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:24:50 -0500 From: Michael Orlitzky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111202 Thunderbird/8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ext4 inode limit reached References: <4EE5E268.9090404@admin-box.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE5E268.9090404@admin-box.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 66f32c5f-ee90-401d-938a-e737de77d59d X-Archives-Hash: 95ab075d719ace625d1c2ddab7c33320 On 12/12/2011 06:15 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote: > > $ fsck -vf /dev/sda5 > [..] > 655360 inodes used (100.00%) > [..] > > $ find /gentoo -xdev | wc -l > 655338 > > That's really disappointing. I was using reiser3fs and XFS before, and > they didn't have that kind of limitation... Uhm... not meant as a rant - > I like ext4 - that's why I'm moving (almost?) everything to it... > > Is there any way to raise the number of inodes without using > $ mkfs.ext4 -N BIGNUM 640k should be enough for anybody.