From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RYRYM-0006vt-Gq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:09:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12C1D21C540; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 00:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE8721C55D for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 00:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbg18 with SMTP id g18so1203359ghb.40 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:05:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PuBEOk1ES/AV4XJMoH+iF6YmD6/jl2G0+Bvy0wnfWDk=; b=UpzNViskfJELe+MauQDxIX/fph+N/AkDVgNp4YxZETEAZ9YLkrA47VSt2TaKIPe7PY MzgO4koT546N+8zyVRqWlEuF/hLI9NAwwIaK0iF+trK+ZFyc13pVFqS3vgoXdY8tjBqD oQvfVm5pbKSNtqooocSTEUYZ0kVedRVxY6uIs= Received: by 10.236.200.164 with SMTP id z24mr633063yhn.127.1323302721414; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:05:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-109-157.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.109.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n5sm5888214yhk.1.2011.12.07.16.05.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:05:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EDFFF3E.9050004@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:05:18 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111022 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: --jobs References: <87vcps0z6d.fsf@newsguy.com> <20111208010856.2eae7db6@rohan.example.com> <87r50g0wu0.fsf@newsguy.com> In-Reply-To: <87r50g0wu0.fsf@newsguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: df4e50af-eead-4761-8bf5-d113d218b74c X-Archives-Hash: 2771bba8d035349db824978dc134333c Harry Putnam wrote: > Alan McKinnon writes: > >> On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:55:38 -0600 >> Harry Putnam wrote: >> >>> Under the newest portage with x86~, if I run `emerge -vuD world' >>> should I see something besides: >>> >>>>>> Jobs 0 of 71 complete, 1 running [...] >>> Shouldn't there be more jobs running? >>> >>> (This is on gentoo installed as guest on win7 using Vbox) >> What is the first job? >> >> Assuming that the system is set up to run parallel jobs, you have 71 >> updates. That's quite a lot. Maybe the first one is some really basic >> package in @system upon which the other 70 depend (directly or >> indirectly). Portage must complete the first fully in that case, then >> proceed. >> >> Or, that first job is portage itself. It makes sense that portage >> updates should be done in isolation. > Now 38 are installed and it has never shown more than 1 running. > Appears to be doing them all one by one. > > I'm not sure what you mean about system being setup for parallel jobs. > > Isn't the new default emerge to run that way? Isn't that why we now > have this line about jobs and load that completely removes the old -v > ouput? > > This is a brand new install, and I've changed very little. I've done > nothing consciously to effect how many jobs are to be run. > > If its only going to do the jobs one by one, then why cover the -v > output? > > I'd sooner disable this new behavior but it appears there is no across > the board way to do that. Maybe a function like: > > emg () { emerge --quite-build=n $@; } > > Would have that effect. I can't see where it would be losing anything > since emerge is doing 1 job at a time anyway. By the way, are these > heavy or unusual loads: > > 1.10 1.17 1.14 > > Its an i7 processor but gentoo is running as vbox guest. > > > If you are emerging packages one at a time, look at my sig. I'm thinking you are expecting to see the configure, gcc and install info like it used to be by default. The new default doesn't show that. If you want the old way, see my sig for the option to put in make.conf. If I am wrong on what you are expecting, ignore me. Lots of people do anyway. lol Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"