From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RXmuX-0005TS-0n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 04:45:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 222AF21C16C; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D85421C05D for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.17.29.6] (unknown [65.213.236.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75C7737ADC for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 23:43:53 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2; t=1323146633; bh=zFUaYzdeyQNcRsDFRL6hk4NrNUR+61uiZtcP1GlsfPM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VA7tSuJp7jJn6LGF285NYY6n6tURhSLuCvNjMp96ceAUmK+0fy9awCDA7J6deOKcP YLB2f8UxuI5YUI6kY9gN/4Abwn0YwDvlX6yHcqR2Nt1+vGlIhZgUx9H3HZr1JUwF+h jWe96bhjKUncnrLydu2QZQkEoWre0epHo9I3eFgU= Message-ID: <4EDD9D88.7080407@orlitzky.com> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:43:52 -0500 From: Michael Orlitzky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111202 Thunderbird/8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] clamav and spamassassin References: <4EDAA89F.3090308@orlitzky.com> <4EDAD845.4010402@orlitzky.com> <4EDD6749.8030301@orlitzky.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d551c14a-f093-4200-adc0-58c1d6ea5b8b X-Archives-Hash: ccc93d3d90027782641751bedb3e0589 On 12/05/2011 10:24 PM, Grant wrote: > > What about trouble with the DNSBL lists? I know when I changed my IP > address I had to work to get the new one removed from a few blacklists > it had previously been placed on. I wasn't sending spam, but my > messages would have been blocked under that config if I hadn't done > the work to get the IP off the lists. > > - Grant > We do get false positives from the blacklists on rare occasion, but they're the same ones we got before postscreen. Before postscreen, we had, smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, ... reject_rbl_client psbl.surriel.com, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org, permit After postscreen, we have, smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, ... permit postscreen_dnsbl_sites = psbl.surriel.com, bl.spamcop.net, zen.spamhaus.org, b.barracudacentral.org The two should be more or less equivalent considering that postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 1. (I should mention that you have to register with barracuda before using their list.)