From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RVDUz-0003Ez-5K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:32:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BAB421C034; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF22B21C025 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 02:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnr1 with SMTP id r1so7840192ggn.40 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:31:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jW3jQHmHG0Y+QWyx154TJZyekzAm/wYlg+qHkG2dvqM=; b=r2O7yc3Bj3p5acyH4X1W5mM4raGRZn/o+fjF1WOmAxo+aaX5fu98n69cAgR+Ub24ZH i3WTnXQziySvH5V+IEsLAMOE/T+Yh32IKn2jSgfhYeGFLvJFNEYmNYlU66RwglpKCO97 enuRUrgtPbZn7Yg7o0xxBbS+AORtxKo5fo+/M= Received: by 10.236.78.130 with SMTP id g2mr65559011yhe.79.1322533860112; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:31:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-115-63.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.115.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm97743350anu.10.2011.11.28.18.30.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:30:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4ED443E1.2000901@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:30:57 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111022 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What happened to OpenRC 0.9.6? References: <4ED28F6A.7090606@alyf.net> <1322483386.66469.4.camel@stretch> <1322497904.6295.6.camel@stretch> <20111128184152.03279681@rohan.example.com> <1322500968.6295.23.camel@stretch> <20111128202813.27970c86@rohan.example.com> <4ED43135.8070606@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6e24a835-e30a-4feb-907c-a4221713cea5 X-Archives-Hash: 58eedec1468b2fa5b928d707452c7a19 James Wall wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:22:48 -0500 >>> "Albert W. Hopkins" wrote: >>> >>>> But my feeling is, if you use the testing branch and you *don't* find >>>> bugs, then you aren't testing hard enough :P >>> Or maybe I just got used to dealing with occasional oopsies and >>> stopped noticing them... >>> >>> I do that a lot at work too. Some days I can tell you I found and >>> dealt with more than one issue or bug but can't recall afterwards what >>> it was. >>> >>> I'm still undecided if this is a good thing, a bad thing, or neither >>> >> >> Uh oh. I do that too. Thing is, I can't forget hal. O_O I do forget >> those little things I run into and fix easily tho. >> >> Is it age? :-( >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> >> -- >> I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how >> you interpreted my words! >> >> >> > You had to bring up that ugly beast, didn't you.... > Sorry. ;-) < Dale goes back to his hole now > Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!