From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-131578-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RUTFW-0001EN-8T
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 01:09:42 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3BCB21C06B;
	Sun, 27 Nov 2011 01:09:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6323421C16F
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Nov 2011 01:06:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggnr1 with SMTP id r1so5793973ggn.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:06:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=1uIEqDjSgX73OjmvFx6Fv9U0qHNr7tQ+Re+wTdSl/Zc=;
        b=ffLCJETjBR4WkYHMtArufem32cy3nXIlk7qeR9rGPlPCw9wq0qIQkY8f2PUigeZY5K
         0QfpZAOK+FfeL4QlD4eaaBUYWLwccAORVq5HUZpWtI5DhPOy9xpfJhoYGfeUmU0JvD26
         OygR1f/LJX6Gaz3L7AV1cf1FK7HQddjYBBxwQ=
Received: by 10.236.22.164 with SMTP id t24mr54801914yht.67.1322355985947;
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:06:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-66-118.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.66.118])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm47337808anv.16.2011.11.26.17.06.24
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4ED18D0F.1070201@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 19:06:23 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111022 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LibreOffice 3.4.4: required HDD space
References: <20111120110905.1c443c4a.v_2e@ukr.net> <CA+czFiDKj3WGGcTpS60+uaom+tAuxSr8JwMwKOEL4DBEzRAusw@mail.gmail.com> <20111120183213.0ab85329@digimed.co.uk> <CA+hid6F6JcfzJ9SsjtdeotZYSd2rYySdr47ZorJAsSFYeLd1KA@mail.gmail.com> <20111120220947.4297b198@rohan.example.com> <CA+hid6GM7VU2kEKJjiu43h7TWE3CjR7wNszVA_D1_Nq9dHMUWQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111126161026.1e10457d@rohan.example.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111126161026.1e10457d@rohan.example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 55f779e0-f63a-4f5f-a6f5-a9c242de7de0
X-Archives-Hash: 9e8d01e5376fee9b87c6d4011a50dab5

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 9G is what the dev reckons is the maximum. This other figure of 4G - 
> what is that? The amount needed by some arb combination on some arb 
> user's machine? That's not a good enough criteria. It's not really the 
> maximum plus one well-defined other. It's is the maximum plus every 
> other possible combination (there is no defined minimal). If it's an 
> issue for you, the solution is simple - keep a copy of the ebuild in 
> your local overlay and edit the space requirements. Keep it up to date 
> and in-sync with the ebuild in the main tree. It means you get to a 
> little extra work, but is preferable to the dev doing a lot of extra work

With a compile that takes as long as LOo does, I'd want the dev to be on 
the side of caution rather than underestimating it.  If the max is 9Gbs, 
then that is what they should check for.  I would much rather the dev do 
that than for me to get to about 90% of the compile done then get the 
little message that it is out of space.  I wouldn't be "hal" mad but it 
would sort of tick me off a bit.  ;-)  Maybe not as bad as /usr on init 
or using a init thingy either.  Still a bit upset tho.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!