From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-131146-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RQanH-0004Oa-Am
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8E5421C0EE;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:24:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0B921C091
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:23:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ywp18 with SMTP id 18so6769326ywp.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:23:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=/b13CuRMsP8KjMw7NfTA3iEyTlvBRXDiYuHEvdG/+48=;
        b=sscA8hauVNTDgobK0/cu5SYSnz6gYzxWdTxU4JE8SoEQvIa+ZN99acYk+Y26Np2eRI
         hboHptfWjR7m/VBlBgZWmNJOgQvQtT9+W6cztOAOkB91Aw0JJwWBAH3qCr+PBqh889IV
         XYE7XUz+bpiRUktfvW4qr1pWKWHAnTbNyF6RQ=
Received: by 10.101.160.5 with SMTP id m5mr9943376ano.3.1321431807477;
        Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:23:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-124-88.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.124.88])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v5sm83762874anf.3.2011.11.16.00.23.25
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:23:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EC372FC.3040608@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:23:24 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111022 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] swapping processor problem
References: <4EC215DE.50202@st.com> <CA+czFiB7QqBt1mh7N-xQqH-W3HCjCY0CtT_ip2Jgy09xGoCn4A@mail.gmail.com> <4EC36768.8030409@gmail.com> <4EC36F66.30204@st.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC36F66.30204@st.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c752e725-49ea-4cd8-9f8d-aac01964802c
X-Archives-Hash: 2add6e0b79b960854b8a4763ea98c2b2

Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
> On 11/16/2011 08:34 AM, Dale wrote:
>> I agree tho that checking those BIOS setting is a good start.  If that fails, boot a CD or something, chroot in, do a emerge -e system.  Maybe make some corrections to the kernel then try booting.  Oh, I'd rebuild the input drivers to, mouse and keyboard.  Check the USE flags too.  I'm not sure what all options they have.
>>
> Boot from CD also was failing with a lock so I think it was a mobo/CPU
> incompatibility issue. Nevertheless I'd like to understand the points
> you and Michael are making.
>
> The Award BIOS has almost no CPU-related options.
> There is no way I can control cache size from BIOS.
> Since the memory controller is integrated in the Athlon64 I'd think DRAM
> settings page could be affected by a CPU swap but I have it all set to
> 'auto' so I suppose that the BIOS should fix them after the swap.
> USB is implemented on southbridge, not on CPU.
>
> I found no parameter in the kernel config that could be affected by the
> CPU swap except for SMP setting, but a misconfiguration there should not
> cause a hang, just a core not being used.
>
> Which drivers should be affected by a CPU swap? All the ones I can think
> of are motherboard-related, not CPU-related.
>
> Thanks for the hint on gcc, I'll check the differences on the two
> systems once I have them back up and working.
>

You could be right that it is a mobo CPU issue.  When you are grasping 
at straws, just grab all you can.  Since you got it to work then I 
wouldn't think it was software, a failing hardware such as a bad CPU or 
a bad kernel.

Generally if it works on a CD, then it is software.  If it also fails 
from a CD, then it should be hardware.  Sounds like yours is a hardware 
issue but just a compatibility problem, not failure.

Maybe check if there is a BIOS update available?  Might be worth a shot.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!