From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RNFSC-0006Z6-OA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 03:00:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37E0621C01F; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 03:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E968B21C01F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 02:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.17.29.6] (unknown [65.213.236.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A1C037AD8 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 21:59:36 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2; t=1320634777; bh=kMOB1Hs1gPWxo/z8Rzo3eHrj95Jqt1JVsHQT8KdZFdg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cIlk3NGkJOKkeAVuBbBjNATDepPS34iSeUflY4/DTPx4LQNeDD17gPUeInHGm8I7o /8v3pNtuBEHhHK0u0TEwNMR5OKzeuS5I3ORPOrDGUNokjyOcmmNoA27krCLGy71C+4 vw332YHFiKMhNYxEe74VKM76nXyaT0LfDv9WQxgQ= Message-ID: <4EB74995.5000802@orlitzky.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:59:33 -0500 From: Michael Orlitzky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110923 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.12 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Any experience with RhodeCode? References: <4EB4013C.8010000@orlitzky.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7e273951-187a-46e8-9578-067d8104224c X-Archives-Hash: ffca15316e423016b68ba1d25985b1a1 On 11/06/2011 06:49 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > On Nov 4, 2011 10:17 PM, "Michael Orlitzky" > wrote: >> >> On 11/04/2011 11:00 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: >> > I'm looking for a nice, lightweight way to implement a Mercurial server. >> > Somehow, installing a heavyweight webserver just for Mercurial seems >> > so... wasteful. >> >> If it's not for public use, you can clone/pull/whatever over SSH. >> > > That's news to me... so I don't have to install a Mercurial server at all? > Nope. $ hg help urls URL Paths Valid URLs are of the form: local/filesystem/path[#revision] file://local/filesystem/path[#revision] http://[user[:pass]@]host[:port]/[path][#revision] https://[user[:pass]@]host[:port]/[path][#revision] ssh://[user[:pass]@]host[:port]/[path][#revision] ... There's a section in there about SSH URLs you'll probably want to read. You need Mercurial installed on the server machine, and its path handling is a little weird if you're used to another SCM. Works fine without a web server, though.