From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RN4oz-0001bg-Ui for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 15:39:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47BBF21C157; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115C721C049 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywe9 with SMTP id 9so5564544ywe.40 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 07:38:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5D5PlDvHkxsoShQLWfKtBdwM/yJdAf2I/+gldm/Xo78=; b=wYZ7qtnEwoX7Q09RMFxvJsxWC0Bl10OgBd/SLuQ6hLdxz+qrH5+Q6TbmJwUtj8ddj4 umrd7WwVBkmhxbshxBgoG+JqSRVKfQ/P6uawdq9lXHw/5x8BiZuXwMuHjJvC+g3UgkUU D8nJs2H9MLGUZ4KQKVbsYPcTeExaL75gkthCw= Received: by 10.236.22.164 with SMTP id t24mr29712963yht.67.1320593922562; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 07:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-124-88.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.124.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w68sm24030650yhe.14.2011.11.06.07.38.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 06 Nov 2011 07:38:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EB6AA00.3070405@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:38:40 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111022 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev rules for an iPod Touch? References: <2491658.fmJRqFslx8@eve> <4EB6A355.50400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9dd604d5-b627-4504-9bbc-5501064c18ee X-Archives-Hash: bb543ff2e2f8c4af7c62f4406f7648ba Mark Knecht wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Dale wrote: >> Mark Knecht wrote: >>> I hope anyone reading who doesn't donate will at least consider donating. >>> Even donating once a year is a big help. It's not painful and whole blood >>> donations are easy. I do apheresis which takes longer as it draws my blood, >>> separates the contents, keeps the plasma& platelets and then returns the >>> rest of my blood back to my body. (Spooky!) ;-) Cheers, Mark >> I would draw the line at it coming back. If something wasn't cleaned right, >> they will find it when they test the blood later. Thing is, if something >> wasn't cleaned right, you get it back. I'd just drink a glass of orange >> juice. lol >> >> Dale > Yeah, that was my concern before I started doing the process it but > it's a very interesting engineering solution to building a closed > system where everything is put in brand new for each donation. It's > this huge package of plastic tubes and hoses which are sealed until > moments before the blood draw so I'm not overly worried, but it's > really easy to understand why others would be, and for those folks > they should just do whole blood donations which only take blood out > and nothing returns. With those it's only a matter of a clean needle. > > - Mark > > Well, if they do all that, then I could see how that isn't a problem. I still sort of like the one clean needle thing tho. I got enough health issues so I don't need some microscopic critter hitching a ride and making more problems for me. So, be careful. Keep a eye on them. Wouldn't want to lose a Gentoo user. ^_^ Dale :-) :-)