From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RMLUV-0005Mk-UA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:15:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53AE521C0C3; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C63021C09F for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 15:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.17.29.6] (unknown [65.213.236.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6450437ADF for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:14:07 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2; t=1320419647; bh=Z7pXQezca+etGvORvnDPEay5lw3gag3bFb34Jp5WbNY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WCW5ziMR4sHcEGiTR/gApVgJobwk9VctF9qgNwk1lqEow1ufCUzwZzqZ3vRkKrDT8 qbFgPzoB2XXqRDZzigCxpYKP3P9/NDuGJBuCXIAd2QR6C9p4GRdqKi26UKzbARtTeE tkdV0oDl9dq5lbkN/kJgulCuNZDg9lDuzjxUgD8c= Message-ID: <4EB4013C.8010000@orlitzky.com> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:14:04 -0400 From: Michael Orlitzky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110923 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.12 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Any experience with RhodeCode? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 329b230f-7b12-42d7-8b14-4157e5c1941f X-Archives-Hash: edbf889388372112f825232c8a80a46b On 11/04/2011 11:00 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > I'm looking for a nice, lightweight way to implement a Mercurial server. > Somehow, installing a heavyweight webserver just for Mercurial seems > so... wasteful. If it's not for public use, you can clone/pull/whatever over SSH.