From: Florian Philipp <lists@binarywings.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drive RPMs and data speed.
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:49:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA9A7CB.7060403@binarywings.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EA9952A.4030909@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1272 bytes --]
Am 27.10.2011 19:30, schrieb Dale:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag 27 Oktober 2011, 13:09:17 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
>>> On 10/27/2011 11:15 AM, Dale wrote:
>>>> Howdy,
>>>>
>>>> I'm wanting to get a hard drive that is pretty good size. I'm looking
>>>> for about 1 to 2TBs or so. Thing is, a lot of them seem to be 5900 or
>>>> even 5400 rpm drives. I realize that the data on there is packed pretty
>>>> tight so I want to ask a few people that may have one or more of these
>>>> things a few questions. Are they as fast as a slower RPM drive?
>>> I assume you meant to say "as fast as a faster RPM drive". No, of
>>> course not. If we're speaking about the same capacity and amount of
>>> platters, of course. If we're not, then yes, they can be as fast
>>> because of the higher data density.
>>>
[...]
>
> I just wonder how much data they will be able to pack into a 3.5" drive
> tho. Hmmmmm. Surely they will run out of room at some point. I mean,
> the heads have got to have a little room to work with.
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
Well, then this story might cheer you up ;)
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2011/10/researchers-increase-hard-drive-density-sixfold-with-salt.ars
Regards,
Florian Philipp
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-27 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-27 8:15 [gentoo-user] Hard drive RPMs and data speed Dale
2011-10-27 10:09 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-10-27 11:18 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-27 16:24 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-27 17:30 ` Dale
2011-10-27 17:51 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-27 18:41 ` Dale
2011-10-27 18:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-27 19:17 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-27 19:41 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-27 20:00 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-28 14:55 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-28 15:19 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-28 19:08 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-31 16:21 ` Alex Schuster
2011-10-31 16:53 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-31 18:47 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-27 20:36 ` Bill Longman
2011-10-27 20:11 ` Paul Hartman
2011-10-27 18:49 ` Florian Philipp [this message]
2011-10-28 4:10 ` Dale
2011-10-28 11:15 ` Mark Knecht
2011-10-28 11:36 ` Dale
2011-10-28 13:40 ` Michael Mol
2011-10-28 14:18 ` Paul Hartman
2011-10-28 15:53 ` Mark Knecht
2011-10-28 19:11 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-10-28 20:49 ` Mark Knecht
2011-10-30 5:04 ` daid kahl
2011-10-31 9:49 ` [gentoo-user] " James Broadhead
2011-10-31 10:58 ` Dale
2011-10-31 14:42 ` James Broadhead
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA9A7CB.7060403@binarywings.net \
--to=lists@binarywings.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox