From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RGi3f-0000cP-JE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:08:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74C4121C075; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s1.itech7.com (s1.itech7.com [94.76.222.184]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA4C21C04F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s1.itech7.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA2D3E60 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:37:23 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4E9F825A.1030105@nileshgr.com> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:37:22 +0530 From: Nilesh Govindarajan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111007 Thunderbird/7.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Networkmanager-9999 won't compile References: <4E9E98AF.5000401@nileshgr.com> <1319057561.485731.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4E9F7296.2050001@nileshgr.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: d41ea9969275b70789963e2fb1cd383b On 10/20/2011 06:57 AM, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan > wrote: >> On Thu 20 Oct 2011 05:30:24 AM IST, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrot= e: >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Albert W. Hopkins >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 13:11 -0700, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wro= te: >>>>> Why don't you try networkmanager-0.9.1.90? It's working great for m= e >>>>> in GNOME 3.2.0 >>>>> >>>>> Is there something in the live ebuild that you need? >>>>> >>>> I can't confirm (never tried it) but I've been told the autounmask >>>> option in portage will "blindly" unmask even live ebuilds.. which mi= ght >>>> account for people suddenly pulling in a surprising (and potentially >>>> problematic) amount of live ebuilds. >>> >>> I haven't tried the autounmask option from portage, neither. The GNOM= E >>> overlay offers a series of files you can link to your >>> /etc/portage/package.{unmask,keywords,use,use.mask} directories: They >>> are located in >>> >>> ${OVERLAYDIR}/status/portage-configs/ >>> >>> I haven't used those either, though. I prefer to unmask/keyword >>> packages myself. What I do know is that using live ebuilds is >>> basically flipping a coin; sometimes will work great, sometimes it >>> will not even compile. >>> >>> Right now the only live ebuilds I'm using are: >>> >>> gnome-extra/libgda-9999 >>> media-sound/rhythmbox-9999 >>> sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility-9999 >>> gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions-weather-9999 >>> gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions-system-monitor-9999 >>> >>> Everything else works with the latest non-live ebuilds. >>> >>> Regards. >> >> Did you just do emerge gnome (assumging that >=3Dgnome-base/gnome-3.0 = is >> in package.unmask)? I'll try doing that again then, till now autounmas= k >> was active. >=20 > I did emerge =3Dgnome-base/gnome-3.2.0, and unmasked/keyworded by hand > the necessary packages. But maybe just check that the "**" is not in > any file on /etc/portage/package.keyworks/* (except perhaps the ones > I'm using). If there is no "**" keyworkd, no non-live ebuild should be > installed. >=20 > Oh, and also in /etc/portage/package.unmask/*, of course. >=20 > Good luck. BTW, which overlays did you use? I tried after reading (translated version of) german guide on the web these - gnome, keruspe, suka, rubenqba --=20 Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com