From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RGh0Z-0005Ow-9B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:01:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C87021C095; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s1.itech7.com (s1.itech7.com [94.76.222.184]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F7821C04A for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s1.itech7.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367ED3E60 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:30:07 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4E9F7296.2050001@nileshgr.com> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:30:06 +0530 From: Nilesh Govindarajan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111007 Thunderbird/7.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Networkmanager-9999 won't compile References: <4E9E98AF.5000401@nileshgr.com> <1319057561.485731.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 1bc7318618ee7bc4ff76509d09d90aa7 On Thu 20 Oct 2011 05:30:24 AM IST, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Albert W. Hopkins > wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 13:11 -0700, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote= : >>> Why don't you try networkmanager-0.9.1.90? It's working great for me >>> in GNOME 3.2.0 >>> >>> Is there something in the live ebuild that you need? >>> >> I can't confirm (never tried it) but I've been told the autounmask >> option in portage will "blindly" unmask even live ebuilds.. which migh= t >> account for people suddenly pulling in a surprising (and potentially >> problematic) amount of live ebuilds. > > I haven't tried the autounmask option from portage, neither. The GNOME > overlay offers a series of files you can link to your > /etc/portage/package.{unmask,keywords,use,use.mask} directories: They > are located in > > ${OVERLAYDIR}/status/portage-configs/ > > I haven't used those either, though. I prefer to unmask/keyword > packages myself. What I do know is that using live ebuilds is > basically flipping a coin; sometimes will work great, sometimes it > will not even compile. > > Right now the only live ebuilds I'm using are: > > gnome-extra/libgda-9999 > media-sound/rhythmbox-9999 > sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility-9999 > gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions-weather-9999 > gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions-system-monitor-9999 > > Everything else works with the latest non-live ebuilds. > > Regards. Did you just do emerge gnome (assumging that >=3Dgnome-base/gnome-3.0 is=20 in package.unmask)? I'll try doing that again then, till now autounmask=20 was active. --=20 Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com