From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1REyBL-00076J-6h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:57:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2CDD21C02E; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:57:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f180.google.com (mail-yx0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF03E04F2 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxm34 with SMTP id 34so1767251yxm.11 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:56:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=UaOKSXB51SCku+ELc1CtmGy6K5EPi8s9G0w1sNr159s=; b=S80rXQ2TpNarYuk2aXlqhsnYHaaa/zTBY33966266R3JAJJuEb4HZsBpn1hq5iP0VF LVBMuLUU3MPbD2ArGiaJfyVwDAGTIBlcAZakdiQ+s3mbGzboi6L3bllqMEBvzdqgvXE2 q7tpLJ+Xsp9XAlQklza4e73pufVNdTbmvi6P4= Received: by 10.236.145.105 with SMTP id o69mr16339888yhj.24.1318661765225; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-215-244.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.215.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w70sm8508952yhk.6.2011.10.14.23.56.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E992E82.5010103@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:56:02 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111013 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Apologize to everyone for my nonprofessional References: <4E98601C.3030607@gmail.com> <20111014224110.7acaf5b3@digimed.co.uk> <4E98BBE4.6040306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050803090308050702090104" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 5648ed530b2dceb9c348b90235006eb0 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050803090308050702090104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, "Dale" > wrote: > > > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> > >>> A'right now. I'm going to start on hal and /usr being on / again. > :-P > >> > >> Jeez, 43 years on and you're still going on about it... > >> > >> > > > > Dang, I was only a year old when hal came out? That just doubled my > age. It's closer to what I feel like tho. > > > > I'm still not happy with /usr being required tho. That is still > standing on a bad nerve. Don't worry tho, I got plenty of those bad > nerves. :-P > > > > Do you know that there's a plan to move /var/run to / also? ;-) > > Rgds, > Now someone on here swears up and down that /var isn't going to be required on /. I'm telling ya'll, /home is coming. We are going to end up where we can only have one drive in our Linux boxes for the OS and its relatives. That or we will ALL have to start using the pesky init* thingy. I got 7 acres of land here, complete with trees. If someone can find the dev that started this mess, I can find some rope. Just saying. ;-) Oh, I live half a mile from the river too. Makes for a good dump site. lol I noticed the other day that when LVM tries to start, it fails. I have /var on a separate partition here. It was complaining about something on /var missing. So, you may be late in reporting this. I think it is already needed for LVM if /usr or /var is on a separate partition. < sighs > Dale :-) :-) --------------050803090308050702090104 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pandu Poluan wrote:


On Oct 15, 2011 5:49 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
>
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:15:24 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>> A'right now. =C2=A0I'm going to start on hal and /us= r being on / again. =C2=A0:-P
>>
>> Jeez, 43 years on and you're still going on about it...<= br> >>
>>
>
> Dang, I was only a year old when hal came out? =C2=A0That ju= st doubled my age. =C2=A0It's closer to what I feel like tho.
>
> I'm still not happy with /usr being required tho. =C2=A0That= is still standing on a bad nerve. =C2=A0Don't worry tho, I got plent= y of those bad nerves. =C2=A0:-P
>

Do you know that there's a plan to move /var/run to / also? ;-)

Rgds,



Now someone on here swears up and down that /var isn't going to be required on /.=C2=A0 I'm telling ya'll, /home is coming.=C2=A0 We are= going to end up where we can only have one drive in our Linux boxes for the OS and its relatives.=C2=A0 That or we will ALL have to start using t= he pesky init* thingy.

I got 7 acres of land here, complete with trees.=C2=A0 If someone can find the dev that started this mess, I can find some rope.=C2=A0 Just saying.=C2=A0 ;-)=C2=A0 Oh, I live half a mile from the river too.=C2= =A0 Makes for a good dump site.=C2=A0 lol

I noticed the other day that when LVM tries to start, it fails.=C2=A0= I have /var on a separate partition here.=C2=A0 It was complaining abou= t something on /var missing.=C2=A0 So, you may be late in reporting thi= s.=C2=A0 I think it is already needed for LVM if /usr or /var is on a separate partition.=C2=A0

< sighs >

Dale

:-)=C2=A0 :-)=C2=A0
--------------050803090308050702090104--