From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-129473-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1RCB2x-0004S8-M3
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:05:07 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4C6521C0E2;
	Fri,  7 Oct 2011 14:04:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9E621C0F2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  7 Oct 2011 14:03:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.17.29.14] (unknown [65.213.236.242])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E1E137ADA
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  7 Oct 2011 10:03:54 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2;
	t=1317996234; bh=fKo//QUaXmNQGB9nRvH+iqpNlD0T+GyCyhkKEQx1y04=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=btIAwuz+qw3lQZN47rN11qe6DvSf/m/ayFXFxh6iUaFj3l+WUcSC1udUKn/z0BhPl
	 1yskkkXNuHW2XRQcJZXdXLBvn6OeawmJ/ctQT7tbG9HP2Q9Ddl1vGngGdbd09QQopQ
	 N+vC/bFYE2JzWbvK3VMzJ+r7erLdlljSTv5XJKTA=
Message-ID: <4E8F06C9.8040704@orlitzky.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:03:53 -0400
From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@orlitzky.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110923 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage wants to remove less and nano
References: <4E8E13FA.40308@linuxsystems.it>	<CACs9S6ZqDxLZUOr-1RHcghwhaDxtNXhxdSHgFnwZNbL71a-6DA@mail.gmail.com>	<4E8E5E9A.7030306@gmail.com>	<4E8E61C0.1070009@orlitzky.com> <20111007093026.47851bf1@rohan.example.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111007093026.47851bf1@rohan.example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 3098299335428a3d792e884c7fe34034

On 10/07/2011 03:30 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 
> Didn't we thrash this one to death already 2 months ago?
> 
> Wasn't Zac's response that virtuals are inappropriate in the system set?
> 

I didn't pay too much attention back then, but for your second question,
these are all @system:

*virtual/dev-manager
*virtual/editor
*virtual/libc
*virtual/man
*virtual/os-headers
*virtual/package-manager
*virtual/pager
*virtual/ssh