From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RBXcE-00020i-7S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:58:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A8B421C27B; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.alltele.net (m1.alltele.net [85.30.0.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387D421C258 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([87.227.57.71]) by smtp.alltele.net (IceWarp 10.3.3) with ESMTP id ODK23343 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:57:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4E8CB6B7.2060207@coolmail.se> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:57:43 +0200 From: pk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20111001 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.12 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Hard drives not detected in repeatable order. References: <1317736959.20875.12.camel@tartarus> <4E8B2D7D.4060107@binarywings.net> <1317821372.5014.2.camel@tartarus> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.27 required=7.00 tests=LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.56,MR_NOT_ATTRIBUTED_IP=0.20,SMILEY=-0.50,NO_RDNS2=0.01,MR_DIFF_MID=1.00 version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (1.1) on smtp.alltele.net X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A0B0203.4E8CB6B8.0057,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: fe57593076e7f9840d586691b2ceadb4 On 2011-10-05 20:54, walt wrote: > You might think, as I did, that PARTUUID stands for the UUID of the > partition you're searching for -- not true :( > > PARTUUID stands for Partition Table UUID, which is entirely different > from a Partition UUID. Clear as mud, eh? IMHO it does seem like a better solution with a file system independent UUID... I only hope the implementation is good. :-/ > I posted a HOWTO on the subject here: > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/225071 Thanks! Best regards Peter K