* [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? @ 2011-10-04 13:38 Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 14:49 ` Spidey 2011-10-04 16:53 ` Pandu Poluan 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw To: Gentoo User I've got a 2 year old Gentoo machine that got patched together using a lot of small hard drives which worked fine for what I used the machine for 2-3 years ago but the machine isn't getting used much anymore. The processor, memory & MB are all reasonably good - i5-661 & 4GB - but my laptop & VM compute server are both faster - so I was wondering what I might do with the box. I saw a Wired article last night about a guy building a NAS box using Debian which got me thinking. I've got a bunch of 1TB Green drives which would make a good base for storage so there's no cost in doing this, but I don't know anything about network attached storage that just works out of the box with Windows clients and I have NO desire (or time) to spend learning stuff that's very Windows specific. If there is a good solution for me it needs to support both Win XP and Win 7 machine and shouldn't require anything be added to the Windows VM. Years ago I tried this basic guide: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/quick-samba-howto.xml I don't remember why but I didn't have much luck with it. However it's been updated and cleaned up a lot so maybe it's OK. Thanks in advance for any ideas. Cheers, Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 13:38 [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 14:49 ` Spidey 2011-10-04 15:43 ` Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 16:53 ` Pandu Poluan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Spidey @ 2011-10-04 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1563 bytes --] On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > I've got a 2 year old Gentoo machine that got patched together using a > lot of small hard drives which worked fine for what I used the machine > for 2-3 years ago but the machine isn't getting used much anymore. The > processor, memory & MB are all reasonably good - i5-661 & 4GB - but > my laptop & VM compute server are both faster - so I was wondering > what I might do with the box. I saw a Wired article last night about a > guy building a NAS box using Debian which got me thinking. I've got a > bunch of 1TB Green drives which would make a good base for storage so > there's no cost in doing this, but I don't know anything about network > attached storage that just works out of the box with Windows clients > and I have NO desire (or time) to spend learning stuff that's very > Windows specific. > > If there is a good solution for me it needs to support both Win XP and > Win 7 machine and shouldn't require anything be added to the Windows > VM. > > Years ago I tried this basic guide: > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/quick-samba-howto.xml > > I don't remember why but I didn't have much luck with it. However it's > been updated and cleaned up a lot so maybe it's OK. > > Thanks in advance for any ideas. > > Cheers, > Mark > > The easiest solution, most used, is probably SAMBA. You should give it a chance again. Claudio Roberto França Pereira (a.k.a. Spidey) hardMOB - HTForum - @spideybr Engenharia de Computação - UFES 2006/1 [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2051 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 14:49 ` Spidey @ 2011-10-04 15:43 ` Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 15:46 ` Daniel da Veiga 2011-10-04 17:01 ` kashani 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Spidey <spideybr@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: <SNIP> >> >> Years ago I tried this basic guide: >> >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/quick-samba-howto.xml >> >> I don't remember why but I didn't have much luck with it. However it's >> been updated and cleaned up a lot so maybe it's OK. >> >> Thanks in advance for any ideas. >> >> Cheers, >> Mark >> > > The easiest solution, most used, is probably SAMBA. You should give it a > chance again. > Yes. Samba is the basis of the link above, and I figure it's going to be the underlying technology that does the work. I was just wondering if there was a more user oriented, possibly GUI based app that did all the dirty work sort of like the CUPS web interface does with CUPS configuration. Thanks, Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 15:43 ` Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 15:46 ` Daniel da Veiga 2011-10-04 17:01 ` kashani 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Daniel da Veiga @ 2011-10-04 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 987 bytes --] On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:43, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Spidey <spideybr@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > <SNIP> > >> > >> Years ago I tried this basic guide: > >> > >> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/quick-samba-howto.xml > >> > >> I don't remember why but I didn't have much luck with it. However it's > >> been updated and cleaned up a lot so maybe it's OK. > >> > >> Thanks in advance for any ideas. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Mark > >> > > > > The easiest solution, most used, is probably SAMBA. You should give it a > > chance again. > > > > Yes. Samba is the basis of the link above, and I figure it's going to > be the underlying technology that does the work. I was just wondering > if there was a more user oriented, possibly GUI based app that did all > the dirty work sort of like the CUPS web interface does with CUPS > configuration. > > SWAT? -- Daniel da Veiga [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1671 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 15:43 ` Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 15:46 ` Daniel da Veiga @ 2011-10-04 17:01 ` kashani 2011-10-04 17:11 ` Mark Knecht 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: kashani @ 2011-10-04 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On 10/4/2011 8:43 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: > Yes. Samba is the basis of the link above, and I figure it's going to > be the underlying technology that does the work. I was just wondering > if there was a more user oriented, possibly GUI based app that did all > the dirty work sort of like the CUPS web interface does with CUPS > configuration. In Samba's case the config is pretty simple if you ignore printing which you should. Just add the IP range, setup a share, and add some accounts or leave it public. Probably take longer to setup a gui. kashani ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 17:01 ` kashani @ 2011-10-04 17:11 ` Mark Knecht 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:01 AM, kashani <kashani-list@badapple.net> wrote: > On 10/4/2011 8:43 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> >> Yes. Samba is the basis of the link above, and I figure it's going to >> be the underlying technology that does the work. I was just wondering >> if there was a more user oriented, possibly GUI based app that did all >> the dirty work sort of like the CUPS web interface does with CUPS >> configuration. > > In Samba's case the config is pretty simple if you ignore printing > which you should. Just add the IP range, setup a share, and add some > accounts or leave it public. Probably take longer to setup a gui. > > kashani > > I suspect you are right, but Alan's recommendation of wicd was so easy to set up and use I'm hoping someone did something similar for NAS solutions. Also, my VMs are both Win XP and Win 7, and my understanding of those is that remote support is different, so I'm concerned I'll end up going down some rabbit hole trying to get the new setup to support everything, but maybe I'm wrong about that? - Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 13:38 [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 14:49 ` Spidey @ 2011-10-04 16:53 ` Pandu Poluan 2011-10-04 17:08 ` Mark Knecht 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Pandu Poluan @ 2011-10-04 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1435 bytes --] On Oct 4, 2011 8:41 PM, "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've got a 2 year old Gentoo machine that got patched together using a > lot of small hard drives which worked fine for what I used the machine > for 2-3 years ago but the machine isn't getting used much anymore. The > processor, memory & MB are all reasonably good - i5-661 & 4GB - but > my laptop & VM compute server are both faster - so I was wondering > what I might do with the box. I saw a Wired article last night about a > guy building a NAS box using Debian which got me thinking. I've got a > bunch of 1TB Green drives which would make a good base for storage so > there's no cost in doing this, but I don't know anything about network > attached storage that just works out of the box with Windows clients > and I have NO desire (or time) to spend learning stuff that's very > Windows specific. > > If there is a good solution for me it needs to support both Win XP and > Win 7 machine and shouldn't require anything be added to the Windows > VM. > > Years ago I tried this basic guide: > > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/quick-samba-howto.xml > > I don't remember why but I didn't have much luck with it. However it's > been updated and cleaned up a lot so maybe it's OK. > > Thanks in advance for any ideas. > If you want to rebuild it totally, why not go the simpler route of installing 'soft appliances' like FreeNAS, OpenFiler, or Nexenta? Rgds, [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1873 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 16:53 ` Pandu Poluan @ 2011-10-04 17:08 ` Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 17:33 ` Pandu Poluan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote: <SNIP> > If you want to rebuild it totally, why not go the simpler route of > installing 'soft appliances' like FreeNAS, OpenFiler, or Nexenta? > > Rgds, > Thanks for the suggestions. I didn't know about any of these. Some comments: 1) The machine is already running Gentoo and is reasonably up to date. (Within 30 days or so) I didn't want to start from scratch but rather just wanted to remove a couple of drives which don't support system needs, throw a couple of 1TB hard drives and hopefully I'm up and running. 2) As for the three suggestions, and at a glance they all look very capable of supporting my limited needs, I really don't want to learn to maintain a server running different tools. (I.e. - anything not portage) I sure like the look of the FreeNAS pages though. Thanks! Cheers, Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 17:08 ` Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 17:33 ` Pandu Poluan 2011-10-04 18:25 ` Mark Knecht 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Pandu Poluan @ 2011-10-04 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1443 bytes --] On Oct 5, 2011 12:10 AM, "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote: > <SNIP> > > If you want to rebuild it totally, why not go the simpler route of > > installing 'soft appliances' like FreeNAS, OpenFiler, or Nexenta? > > > > Rgds, > > > > Thanks for the suggestions. I didn't know about any of these. > > Some comments: > > 1) The machine is already running Gentoo and is reasonably up to date. > (Within 30 days or so) I didn't want to start from scratch but rather > just wanted to remove a couple of drives which don't support system > needs, throw a couple of 1TB hard drives and hopefully I'm up and > running. > > 2) As for the three suggestions, and at a glance they all look very > capable of supporting my limited needs, I really don't want to learn > to maintain a server running different tools. (I.e. - anything not > portage) > > I sure like the look of the FreeNAS pages though. > TBH, I have no experience with either FreeNAS or Nexenta, but people I know in other fora swear by them. As to OpenFiler, I've deployed it several times in my office, twice for production. It's quite easy to manage, especially since it's update-able from the webGUI. There *is* a learning curve, though. Exposing OpenFiler to act as a NAS box that's accessible from Windows has a few gotchas, but after reading some wikis, I got it up and running beautifully. Rgds, [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1834 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? 2011-10-04 17:33 ` Pandu Poluan @ 2011-10-04 18:25 ` Mark Knecht 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-user On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote: > > On Oct 5, 2011 12:10 AM, "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info> wrote: >> <SNIP> >> > If you want to rebuild it totally, why not go the simpler route of >> > installing 'soft appliances' like FreeNAS, OpenFiler, or Nexenta? >> > >> > Rgds, >> > >> >> Thanks for the suggestions. I didn't know about any of these. >> >> Some comments: >> >> 1) The machine is already running Gentoo and is reasonably up to date. >> (Within 30 days or so) I didn't want to start from scratch but rather >> just wanted to remove a couple of drives which don't support system >> needs, throw a couple of 1TB hard drives and hopefully I'm up and >> running. >> >> 2) As for the three suggestions, and at a glance they all look very >> capable of supporting my limited needs, I really don't want to learn >> to maintain a server running different tools. (I.e. - anything not >> portage) >> >> I sure like the look of the FreeNAS pages though. >> > > TBH, I have no experience with either FreeNAS or Nexenta, but people I know > in other fora swear by them. > > As to OpenFiler, I've deployed it several times in my office, twice for > production. It's quite easy to manage, especially since it's update-able > from the webGUI. > > There *is* a learning curve, though. Exposing OpenFiler to act as a NAS box > that's accessible from Windows has a few gotchas, but after reading some > wikis, I got it up and running beautifully. > > Rgds, > I wonder if VMWare monitors this list? I just a couple a minutes ago received an email offering me VMware vSphere Storage Appliance at the low, low cost of $10,180. And that's 40% off list price! :-) - Mark ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-04 18:27 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-10-04 13:38 [gentoo-user] NAS for Windows - does any Wiki solution 'just work'? Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 14:49 ` Spidey 2011-10-04 15:43 ` Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 15:46 ` Daniel da Veiga 2011-10-04 17:01 ` kashani 2011-10-04 17:11 ` Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 16:53 ` Pandu Poluan 2011-10-04 17:08 ` Mark Knecht 2011-10-04 17:33 ` Pandu Poluan 2011-10-04 18:25 ` Mark Knecht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox