* [gentoo-user] Kernel source servers compromised?
@ 2011-10-04 5:41 Mick
2011-10-04 5:55 ` Nilesh Govindarajan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2011-10-04 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 194 bytes --]
Fair enough, but chkrootkit is not the most maintained package. Last version
was released in July 2009.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/04/linux_repository_res/
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel source servers compromised?
2011-10-04 5:41 [gentoo-user] Kernel source servers compromised? Mick
@ 2011-10-04 5:55 ` Nilesh Govindarajan
2011-10-04 14:12 ` Paul Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nilesh Govindarajan @ 2011-10-04 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue 04 Oct 2011 11:11:22 AM IST, Mick wrote:
> Fair enough, but chkrootkit is not the most maintained package. Last version
> was released in July 2009.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/04/linux_repository_res/
This is a quite old news and since then Linus has moved the kernel to
github
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
http://nileshgr.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel source servers compromised?
2011-10-04 5:55 ` Nilesh Govindarajan
@ 2011-10-04 14:12 ` Paul Hartman
2011-10-04 14:25 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Hartman @ 2011-10-04 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan
<contact@nileshgr.com> wrote:
> On Tue 04 Oct 2011 11:11:22 AM IST, Mick wrote:
>> Fair enough, but chkrootkit is not the most maintained package. Last version
>> was released in July 2009.
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/04/linux_repository_res/
>
> This is a quite old news and since then Linus has moved the kernel to
> github
Actually git.kernel.org is back since yesterday. :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel source servers compromised?
2011-10-04 14:12 ` Paul Hartman
@ 2011-10-04 14:25 ` Mark Knecht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Knecht @ 2011-10-04 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Paul Hartman
<paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan
> <contact@nileshgr.com> wrote:
>> On Tue 04 Oct 2011 11:11:22 AM IST, Mick wrote:
>>> Fair enough, but chkrootkit is not the most maintained package. Last version
>>> was released in July 2009.
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/04/linux_repository_res/
>>
>> This is a quite old news and since then Linus has moved the kernel to
>> github
>
> Actually git.kernel.org is back since yesterday. :)
>
>
And considerable work was done to ensure that the source code trees
weren't compromised which is good.
I guess we're still waiting for an analysis to be released to the
public on the root cause of this intrusion?
- Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-04 14:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-04 5:41 [gentoo-user] Kernel source servers compromised? Mick
2011-10-04 5:55 ` Nilesh Govindarajan
2011-10-04 14:12 ` Paul Hartman
2011-10-04 14:25 ` Mark Knecht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox