From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R1iWb-00008U-QX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:36:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A80121C149; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.alltele.net (m1.alltele.net [85.30.0.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC7A21C0B2 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([87.227.57.71]) by smtp.alltele.net (IceWarp 10.3.2) with ESMTP id RAR76414 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:35:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4E68FCD2.8050609@coolmail.se> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:35:14 +0200 From: pk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110901 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.12 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] /dev/sda* missing at boot References: <201108191109.34984.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20110907050952.GA2588@linux1> <4E66FFFA.2020600@gmail.com> <201109071923.39954.Dan.Johansson@dmj.nu> <20110907235457.691be720@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <20110908005500.58ef10fa@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4E68390A.9090106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.77 required=7.00 tests=LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.56,RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC=1.00,MR_NOT_ATTRIBUTED_IP=0.20,NO_RDNS2=0.01,MR_DIFF_MID=1.00 version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (1.1) on smtp.alltele.net X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A0B0202.4E68FCD3.0095,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 3645aad10cbb7dbbf4ced3a9358b6792 On 2011-09-08 16:51, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote: > But the freedom is still there. The freedom to either keep your system > as it is (don't upgrade) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You do realise that this is quite valid for Windows (and all other OS's in existence)? At least so far... Best regards Peter K