From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Gv4-0005oW-2z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:07:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18A5B21C0F6; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8AD21C064 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id F279B2A122 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:06:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=gx4s fYymkNhxTsKx463JLGHSSEI=; b=Ng6AAnbHkEnKZuWj92altYfBUoZ0JaszEu2Q Lf4aSRKpsRPmquarOP6J3r3EgaKBqlU8VhLge+2kMN8tOpCiXD4pr3rEGHYgGBmn E8H5r83TSBXd/GV0qWt/dWpM96EgZsJ6VO1/0k21d1ooFA7QU7/PTdqzKWPDO+2h PG5ZCLo= X-Sasl-enc: 7ccwHNiwo/UWdOm65y4868uX4wRu7Mgb6tk1bms0/jXt 1315397200 Received: from [192.168.5.18] (serv.binarywings.net [83.169.5.6]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD02FB61568 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:06:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E675E3C.3000206@binarywings.net> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:06:20 +0200 From: Florian Philipp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110730 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? References: <4E666C9C.8000605@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig55AD82208A64808CD1B37519" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: cd2924db50575b7ebdae5339510dfd13 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig55AD82208A64808CD1B37519 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 06.09.2011 21:24, schrieb James Broadhead: > On 6 September 2011 19:55, Permjacov Evgeniy wrot= e: >> On 09/06/2011 09:26 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: >>> Disk I/O Characteristic: Occasional writes during 'normal' usage, >>> once-a-week eix-sync + emerge -avuD >>> Priority: Stable (i.e., less chance of corruption), least CPU usage. >=20 > You would have to profile this, but I imagine that the best approach > would be to compile in a RAM disk and copy. I think that you're > probably trying to optimise the wrong part of this problem. >=20 > As for ext3/ext4, the improvements to fsck alone make ext4 the FS of > choice between the two. >=20 > JB >=20 Pandu is building a firewall. Putting a ton of RAM in it just for the sake for system updates is plain overkill and -- depending on his IaaS provider -- pretty expensive. Regards, Florian Philipp --------------enig55AD82208A64808CD1B37519 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5nXkQACgkQqs4uOUlOuU9XKwCcDN/SViPlz0CtGe/Io1VVsBjo Ia8AniUIarrayoH/uiln7JhnL6XkhEL+ =HmMW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig55AD82208A64808CD1B37519--