From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R13ex-0002az-RW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:58:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D8B721C1CB; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 21:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C69521C098 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 21:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so5619902gxk.40 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:55:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zLdzTq61DNvJHvQNQ4Yoc3jSfZ8JMxK5YoQSdDv1T6w=; b=SSTDqhH24OqMCMQW3FN6me42cWfrGbFO16wGHyIA9X9w/vHVg5o+XIR+d+Kf079+bV 7trkK2ucDkx1RFpY0ZPxlpF7OMPTdMpsEPctWej+KMDdiVbQkR9RvC6eqfdUvHQ1LNEi kQQFkJYOrRLHAcH0hRJ2Et6UAIIb53VJqKdAY= Received: by 10.150.116.11 with SMTP id o11mr4555471ybc.191.1315346101937; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-89-228.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.89.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm11325ybb.1.2011.09.06.14.54.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E6696B0.6030704@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:54:56 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110829 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? References: <87ehzuiu1y.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> <4E65405E.8020809@wonkology.org> <20110906015104.GB2510@acm.acm> <20110906111208.393cc39d@weird.wonkology.org> <9B39665D-9010-41DC-B5C3-A259E741F498@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20110906165022.3385f71b@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <4E664830.8090901@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: fcea8af64bee963c879543cbfcb66005 Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2011-09-06, Dale wrote: >> Grant Edwards wrote: >>> On 2011-09-06, Neil Bothwick wrote: >>>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:25:22 +0100, Stroller wrote: >>>> >>>>> Isn't CUPS really bug and bloaty and horrible? >>> It's definitely huge. It does however seem to work pretty well. >>> >>> >> Huge? >> >> root@fireball / # equery s cups >> * net-print/cups-1.5.0-r2 >> Total files : 482 >> Total size : 6.41 MiB >> root@fireball / # >> >> >> If that is considered huge, we have a new standard. lol > I stand corrected. For some reason I was under the impression it was > a lot bigger than that. > I thought so. If it was huge, I was hoping you would post yours. Maybe you have more "stuff" turned on that I do or something. I do like the next reply in this thread tho. lol Dale :-) :-)