From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R11A3-0003fc-8a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:18:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CBD921C196; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from darkmetatron.de (darkmetatron.de [85.214.105.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35F621C089 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.126] (xdsl-78-34-157-212.netcologne.de [78.34.157.212]) by darkmetatron.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 733DF53F0067 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 21:17:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E6671AA.4080307@darkmetatron.de> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:16:58 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_Be=DFler?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110822 Thunderbird/6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? References: <87ehzuiu1y.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> <4E65405E.8020809@wonkology.org> <4E664740.80406@gmail.com> <20110906164938.GC9867@acm.acm> <20110906175554.GE9867@acm.acm> <20110906185725.GG9867@acm.acm> In-Reply-To: <20110906185725.GG9867@acm.acm> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig70D5DD07C7574AF3ADC520A5" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: d129037b25f0c27f406b75c9b6108f83 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig70D5DD07C7574AF3ADC520A5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 06.09.2011 20:57, schrieb Alan Mackenzie: > > Again the code already exists, it's merely a matter of not destroying i= t. > I became a user based on it supporting a standard printing system, and > it's perfectly reasonable for me to expect that support to continue. Is this list really the right place to discuss this? Would not the gentoo-dev list or gentoo bugzilla be better? Assumed that it is gentoo who makes cups now mandatory and not upstream. If it is gentoo then why not just patch the ebuilds in your local overlay and be happy. If it is upstream then all your complains would be better adressed upstream. Maybe they have a bunch of really good reasons to do as they did, reasons nobody HERE knows about. Greetings Sebastian Be=DFler --------------enig70D5DD07C7574AF3ADC520A5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOZnGwAAoJEE2ZiVbqhmXc0xAP/0bMxEohUz13mgnsF6jzT5Ud SMVg3GI3VPmFXcE7r0KVlDHojc0FlY3tSMSM1BxGXiyE8TjSKuGQ90O592M1gw3h rlvt8T7Z4cT7dWoKgBK5YKq1RrAwgOKNjBfbN8Jw19mBxpH9VtBP1J5cD7wnDZdo 8RTlfpHndXBAsWdaFJRQPfFOJKXxCMYCs75K2xmDhB9gseqnQaRhN5/v8DKwyt8v ZJUaPTPFDk3JuwfBA/1doakT8te71cseglCy/IHhST2lYWpdaHgNKfvS3XMSF0nU J2d5EktyXoSURN0Vhozjq6XxdOiDIa7CPQeM2gD2JYh6BNgqXeQWEBz02gRylB1d HwWh25zjGOWy662/nIM7/oAk2d/OhplCwPrIlmtjM59L0Kvj+HsMxLJGetEGZ4pP GmPIudELGEQ89AfM9ehq5a0S8yC3ZEVmRpYlgE0D9bNm5Qf4an1/cAFzfquuklLF EpRj/1JXenEuNMgz4LiwLAOqDnrWJby7tvKRUmZ0lfwcK82yD+pzxGjUa5PnSaer QkQkQ091Ycs9mWWQendO9EpNH6zKZRO6/FeZmVO+2CprhEKXkR/WxtCPFeiTGbz/ fDAG7f8pP5rx9X6dPVvGP/VJvV+EZ6XV5cgPZzJl59wQptoM6YBezwDmdzOxrVFj klvodfn/Z9lJ/p/kTjHE =BVkL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig70D5DD07C7574AF3ADC520A5--