From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R0ySC-0001tl-Vh for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:24:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D320221C1F8; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD7321C19F for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxk38 with SMTP id 38so3972798yxk.40 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ut884htcQRD9Ciby08cr/BseoDEByrmZosvO3DEiLb8=; b=Lt5U5DyI5jRaS2yV1kbY1kTr8NxdXEet4990Ty1/ykxCmc9L7X/clTZaB9fw369vV4 IOCzrECyDYEXMASMaEo9TpqAHFtBuaGelpIZdHsBQUDoSunjT7L2v61pjkjwp0MkC9mu 0TWpSLEqfzO0OTaDLNPq0qt8xksOXD5Qt+POc= Received: by 10.100.230.11 with SMTP id c11mr1713106anh.144.1315326003331; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-89-228.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.89.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h12sm656803anl.5.2011.09.06.09.20.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E664830.8090901@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:20:00 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110829 Firefox/6.0 SeaMonkey/2.3.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? References: <87ehzuiu1y.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> <4E65405E.8020809@wonkology.org> <20110906015104.GB2510@acm.acm> <20110906111208.393cc39d@weird.wonkology.org> <9B39665D-9010-41DC-B5C3-A259E741F498@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <20110906165022.3385f71b@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 5fa13bbf32087d7fba0461353d9ac4d8 Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2011-09-06, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:25:22 +0100, Stroller wrote: >> >>> Isn't CUPS really bug and bloaty and horrible? > It's definitely huge. It does however seem to work pretty well. > > Huge? root@fireball / # equery s cups * net-print/cups-1.5.0-r2 Total files : 482 Total size : 6.41 MiB root@fireball / # If that is considered huge, we have a new standard. lol Dale :-) :-)