From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QtCsK-0000fI-UU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:11:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BC4C21C235; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from darkmetatron.de (darkmetatron.de [85.214.105.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F7021C095 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.126] (xdsl-78-34-170-254.netcologne.de [78.34.170.254]) by darkmetatron.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFF1853F001D for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:10:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E4A09AF.3020104@darkmetatron.de> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:09:51 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_Be=DFler?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage autounmask is strange again References: <4E4957F9.4020505@darkmetatron.de> <4E499DA7.2090302@darkmetatron.de> <4E49B773.8090802@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E49B773.8090802@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig39ECD88E00EF3A96045E6741" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 906a6fa1598c79f8e6a4d830a81a99c6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig39ECD88E00EF3A96045E6741 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 16.08.2011 02:18, schrieb Dale: > Sebastian Be=DFler wrote: >> >> But why was autounmask=3Dy complaining but not autounmask=3Dn? >> The dependency of the virtual was missing both times so shouldn't emer= ge >> spit some error out both times? >> >> Greetings >> >> Sebastian >> >> =20 >=20 > Because autounmask=3Dn assumes you don't want to upgrade anything that = is > masked so it didn't suggest it. But there was a broken dependency, not just something that could be upgraded. autounmask=3Dy now, after setting the virtual to -~amd64 too, i= s quiet and doesn't tells me to unmask anything. Still think that emerge should have thrown an error both times, but if it is ok for anyone here that it doesn't then it is ok for me too ;-) > Ain't life confusing? Yes, yes it is! --------------enig39ECD88E00EF3A96045E6741 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOSgm6AAoJEE2ZiVbqhmXcSIcQAIgWRxQ0tOGV6tNNRXl0t7cW TfpBnF3gyIsYo4AtnrQFhjfzv9K2rjC2w/SHDnu7VVoLDEjyUSEVL9HXCqgNNybh tOSLCMMem7BKrEpEsBJIf+LlrQJWYf/IGKYykqowLCspc1+WZgVwbuqAsGyzQ5pJ D1TTj/EjFQPxXX0nNqYTzH5+1lHDTUfRIi4etzCmK7uOIkHtt6ugLYmcRhd+Kfdu 2+A3YsNzP0b5iJrw8odCrxgPQkfAKULHkIb82eeizzcOQhkjfxL1iSKbh2Vb8Fwi s3qYeY246VVn8sttk8NDe+KGUylsrVYkqFDDRvk1AQOgLmAPmmfEJkPvBDanhbil jG/mE7Hz+xvTsoXxWtDQil68fw2mCD1LLOptW/6mVKRIL52S+1fZUCcYKTIRhu8q 9Emff4YG4dyVS7eW9vTvyzeUW7bkSOpcucjn1e6tt6Tqe0N8iQKCH1s7xnmeTS/B rrByIemduun/e64Vmpo+wY+tEoKrDvEvszc5a5+eI9V2D9zYVsAHA7e9XnTE9hzv H4dHPRMPWdEuMPegEKSREzsoSIe4eOpKYPp/pfFckW3EhsAP4VHepmLRnx/idyHZ v51B/+KJHNX/7795kQjnlHaJHvct/0V4dBhVxrNzA6tZsCYopCPsymfMajBxYAfv Tmva01dgCXsc/URY42MG =GiO4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig39ECD88E00EF3A96045E6741--