From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-126893-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Qt7OE-0000LI-25
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:20:18 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95B8B21C101;
	Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5732921C088
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:19:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vxi39 with SMTP id 39so5445300vxi.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=2a74KwQn5+g1tYLr5LCIN8UglowyL4+imYGAqvMyi6o=;
        b=hIR3BMDObT54FUPz6ARWc+timyg1c1oJ22OjU1kWtFV65K28EivpJO7V3aIIQdozqD
         CS9pJGjYvg3cC84mS+2F4CrYsl4mUtvNPU5XGyNczZpJXzPcakf4ROtDSeWft/+gMMvX
         jPktg/oDfHWrDVxcm24UAFGFk3GWnVx8VWqQU=
Received: by 10.52.32.161 with SMTP id k1mr4334635vdi.78.1313453943762;
        Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-116-190.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.116.190])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k10sm3690925vdi.19.2011.08.15.17.19.01
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E49B773.8090802@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:18:59 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110708 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage autounmask is strange again
References: <4E4957F9.4020505@darkmetatron.de> <CAEH5T2PdSQNReU8EeWX-+2L9Rx5L+YAPNrpm2GbhYmCJr1KRHw@mail.gmail.com> <4E499DA7.2090302@darkmetatron.de>
In-Reply-To: <4E499DA7.2090302@darkmetatron.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: fd72e7ec20b47c4b0bfe88107e765d57

Sebastian Be=DFler wrote:
>
> But why was autounmask=3Dy complaining but not autounmask=3Dn?
> The dependency of the virtual was missing both times so shouldn't emerg=
e
> spit some error out both times?
>
> Greetings
>
> Sebastian
>
>   =20

Because autounmask=3Dn assumes you don't want to upgrade anything that is=
=20
masked so it didn't suggest it.

Ain't life confusing?

Dale

:-)  :-)