From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qt5g1-0008V5-EK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:30:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF72F21C362; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from darkmetatron.de (darkmetatron.de [85.214.105.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F2521C062 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.126] (xdsl-78-34-189-128.netcologne.de [78.34.189.128]) by darkmetatron.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D28A453F001D for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:29:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E499DA7.2090302@darkmetatron.de> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:28:55 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_Be=DFler?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage autounmask is strange again References: <4E4957F9.4020505@darkmetatron.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE655094A411FD88113800702" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 3de933e4959f2296f83c264685204a34 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE655094A411FD88113800702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 15.08.2011 23:33, schrieb Paul Hartman: > Use --tree to get a better idea what package wants the newer ExtUtils-P= arseXS I narrowed it down to emerge perl-core/Module-Build -vp These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies ... done! [ebuild U ] perl-core/ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.20.0 [2.22.06] 0 kB [ebuild R ] perl-core/Module-Build-0.380.0 0 kB Total: 2 packages (1 upgrade, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB The following keyword changes are necessary to proceed: #required by virtual/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.20.0, required by perl-core/Module-Build-0.380.0, required by perl-core/Module-Build (argument) >=3Dperl-core/ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.20.0 ~amd64 and Module-Build-0.380.0 has >=3Dvirtual/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS-2.22.05 in= DEPEND. So yes autounmask was actually right, because I masked perl-core/ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.20.0 but not the virtual-3.20.0. After doing that everything is fine here. But why was autounmask=3Dy complaining but not autounmask=3Dn? The dependency of the virtual was missing both times so shouldn't emerge spit some error out both times? Greetings Sebastian --------------enigE655094A411FD88113800702 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOSZ2oAAoJEE2ZiVbqhmXc4AEP/0VKzWr+s0z1O7tzmdRF0wLL Ft+WNQ4hs4pemDPnbPYFyrADNQ6HnLOtM3bvetvRLo1OcV4J6d7ykluHRTlVbARr 27vr5QuMuzyNE3Jtc5Pk/JVCu+IqibntfSbmfXqf8sPurZD+G5vjpPKGBIJpozBt OaeP6lvd3MXqMVI16hDLDqqO+aFdv7SCdgQiUA8KzSq6EyseXb2BbS339hNFxZbs NcJa4CCf5G/4J254Z08IfWXyH3dBwuDtz3CMNW+zm1T4ZjK6pc9ivFuXL/7sMzEJ Utic9104F5ElCBdQRC2U0fNzbGQSqR/sCRTIVLIAUmkEd8LXpY310wgHw6Ld7xK4 NFSXCIMSNFpSs1XZ4RltEseZy6eejMer3XDK3mJSqoLee+fLTtEOvkKAOE+Q/3E8 7dvv+nUpTPPIeaYFN/AhD8wOUTYa5blDliGokysTlTEk1Jxnd2QyeSwazY99LqHQ kN2hJ5UWgaXcFG7forYG952ZjJBhR9P06g9LXB0AOUQk6J6NFaWYfCt6zkxcWMV2 3zh/cEPR3NHR23tas05G6O+dfrk8r81kBXXf0r2y5z4SNLY3aZmrOCui82pIzMHD P1Z50Gua5l1DESrrSVG0TJGgzZveEqS8gyRAMOCiABgBONN+iiB0rbegn/z6MF4Q y7UKYz94wNL2fZKQW3L8 =CIYz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE655094A411FD88113800702--