From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QrrRW-0000lb-QQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:06:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D21C21C1E9; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.alltele.net (m1.alltele.net [85.30.0.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E6D21C030 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([87.227.57.71]) by smtp.alltele.net (IceWarp 10.3.2) with ESMTP id VVR69107 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:05:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4E452504.6010307@coolmail.se> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:05:08 +0200 From: pk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110724 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Zynaddsubfx connected to Rosegarden WITHOUT Jack? References: <20110809191342.GC6003@solfire> <3960878.U1fKRosroJ@pc> <20110811091321.GE22501@solfire> <16839968.2UE5nfVbuL@pc> <20110811110413.GF22501@solfire> <4E441A48.3000207@coolmail.se> <20110812032844.GA12974@solfire> In-Reply-To: <20110812032844.GA12974@solfire> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.77 required=7.00 tests=LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.56,RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC=1.00,MR_NOT_ATTRIBUTED_IP=0.20,NO_RDNS2=0.01,MR_DIFF_MID=1.00 version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (1.1) on smtp.alltele.net X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A0B020B.4E452504.0140,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 246becc8a7871a2e4103a918a91b179b On 2011-08-12 05:28, meino.cramer@gmx.de wrote: > Is it possible, the jack goes crazy when seeing six cores running > in 64bit mode??? As Michael mentions (in his reply to this mail), it works for him so it should work for you unless your configs (kernel + possible USE flags). Perhaps you can compare? But, have you tried starting jackd from qjackctl, as this mentions?: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=18451 Also, did you read through the entire howto?: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/JACK There seems to be a few steps you need to take before installing jack-audio-connection-kit (kernel configs etc.). > Memory locking is unlimited - this is dangerous. You should probably alter the line: > @audio - memlock unlimited > in your /etc/limits.conf to read: > @audio - memlock 6138036 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Perhaps you should follow this advice as well (after jackd is working for you)... > jackd watchdog: timeout - killing jackd Well, jackd is obviously waiting for something (I have no idea what). Have you tried to run it without the -R (realtime) switch? Since I'm not using jack I'm probably not much of help... MfG Peter K