From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QrGer-00080A-7J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:49:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AAEF21C1AE; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8FC21C19E for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so1309143gwj.40 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:48:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ILTv2PpjpptaVAMN3C+/M3YNc/apYOUPDif1GKzLrA0=; b=vf7F3BS4k07ysw85K8IaWniRxC+uA6UlCvGE7ohGqPYh9s2+vvbAG472B6EziT2f34 xG9bueS4tQ6aeTrH1kV7qMRqUCrB3GMNSQqTwY49vC7Ax5eJwkFFOXfmycTpoWdZgzxy Nd+dhe8q8hh/dMZXZPTf+cDTv/oEKDpSOJ9S8= Received: by 10.151.29.14 with SMTP id g14mr836267ybj.12.1313012883451; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-55-112.jan.bellsouth.net [74.240.55.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v10sm3054160ybm.13.2011.08.10.14.48.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E42FC90.4020400@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:48:00 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110708 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? References: <4E42C67B.1050909@gmail.com> <4E42C971.6050107@gmail.com> <4562529.VSJyiXps7N@eve> <4E42E083.5010909@asyr.hopto.org> <4E42EC49.6040103@gmail.com> <4E42F414.1050006@coolmail.se> In-Reply-To: <4E42F414.1050006@coolmail.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 75d484f7c709f94833a74e7baa354b65 pk wrote: > On 2011-08-10 22:38, Dale wrote: > > >> my CPU works, that shouldn't be the problem. I'll wait until it at >> least gets out of beta. ;-) We all know my record on breaking things. >> lol >> > Yes, if you feel there's nothing wrong with your CPU perhaps it's > prudent to not update to a "beta"... > > Best regards > > Peter K > > > If it wasn't beta, I'd update anyway. At least then I would know what it is not, well most likely anyway. It's the beta that bothers me. I'll try to remember to check back in a month or so to see if it is out of beta. Maybe it does have some sort of fix in it. I sure would like one. I had several days of uptime then it crashed. It has worked fine since too. Dale :-) :-)