From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QqxP2-0001ba-4l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 01:16:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B7D721C41B; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 01:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB84F21C023 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 01:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywb5 with SMTP id 5so270216ywb.40 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:15:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T5gdV4T3T3RIJ0Ghtjw4iMujf0qi8zlRwHbjc9lgzYs=; b=OJu/rKVCdaT+nhHVOe1HgnslP+q1Nl7qkRqh4WkPeIlboZ/1wgrwfpBo8Lru4gTXHI i7rYAH4UI0YcKZTWlovlZz87gUX2GVMJU+K5683eAGlFfdOrtcUuTUvdV/ZbIpxf6xap cy0pECiqS1q1ThdvvCRw8arQ/TkM7VFdkGhJ0= Received: by 10.236.117.212 with SMTP id j60mr1377332yhh.195.1312938903441; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-55-112.jan.bellsouth.net [74.240.55.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f4sm556023yhn.27.2011.08.09.18.15.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E41DB8C.3010007@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:14:52 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110708 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a2d2ae50a9678c4fd0cc688f226735e0 Pandu Poluan wrote: > I noticed Dale's email (hi Dale!) [1] asking about which gcc / glibc > unstable to use. > > Is there any consensus yet as to which 'gcc'? I'm planning on doing an > `emerge -e @system` on two fresh installs, one x86 and the other > amd64. > > Should I go with 4.5.3? Or 4.5.2? Or play it safe and use 4.5.1-r1 > (which, based on b.g.o search [2], seems to have less (serious) bugs > compared to 4.5.2) > > [1] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/234240 > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?order=Importance&short_desc=gcc&resolution=---&query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr > > Rgds, > > > Howdy, I'm using this: root@fireball / # equery list gcc glibc * Searching for gcc ... [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5:4.4 [IP-] [ ] sys-devel/gcc-4.5.3:4.5 * Searching for glibc ... [IP-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.13-r4:2.2 root@fireball / # The higher gcc is the one in use. Everything compiles fine. One thing tho, I started a download and went to town. When I got back, I was sitting at my grub menu. Most likely not related but wanted to mention juuuuuuuuust in case. ;-) Yea, my reboot issues is happening again. :-@ Dale :-) :-)