public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Openoffice being replaced?
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:26:57 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E32D141.4090303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107291602.42293.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>

Mick wrote:
> On Friday 29 Jul 2011 13:07:35 YoYo Siska wrote:
>
>    
>>> Here is mine:
>>>       Wed May 25 10:07:18 2011>>>  app-office/libreoffice-3.3.2
>>>
>>>         merge time: 34 minutes and 10 seconds.
>>>
>>> On my Intel Core i7 920 with 12GB of RAM using tmpfs. :)
>>>
>>> Do those merge times include download time? I wonder...
>>>        
>> BTW, I was emerging libreoofice yesterday, and it took ~3.5 hours,
>> although OOo usually took ~1 hour. It seemed as if it wasn't doing
>> anything paralell, so I blamed my MAKEOPTS="-j -l4" (to which I changed
>> some time ago, but all the OOo compiles were before that). I just tried
>> today again with MAKEOPTS=-j4 and it took only ~1 hour ;).
>> Guess dmake doesn't know the --load-average stuff ;)
>>      
> Hmm, OOo has failed many a time here with -j9.  So now I always emerge it with
> -j1.
>    

I been emerging with -j5 for ages.  I haven't had any problems with that 
before.  I have read about others having it but just not me.  That is 
the weird part.

Dale

:-)  :-)



  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-29 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-28 14:13 [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced? Dale
2011-07-28 14:41 ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 14:50   ` Dale
2011-07-28 14:55     ` skiarxon
2011-07-28 14:56     ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 15:31       ` Mick
2011-07-28 15:36         ` Kfir Lavi
2011-07-28 15:45         ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 16:00           ` Mick
2011-07-28 16:12             ` Tanstaafl
2011-07-28 16:54               ` Dale
2011-07-29  1:41                 ` Bill Kenworthy
2011-07-28 18:45         ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2011-07-28 20:08           ` Dale
2011-07-28 20:25             ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 20:48               ` Dale
2011-07-28 21:02                 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-28 21:15                   ` Alex Schuster
2011-07-28 21:24                   ` Dale
2011-07-28 21:29                     ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 22:37                     ` Alex Schuster
2011-07-28 23:17                       ` Dale
2011-07-29 13:51                         ` Alex Schuster
2011-07-29 20:17                           ` Dale
2011-07-29 12:07               ` YoYo Siska
2011-07-29 15:02                 ` Mick
2011-07-29 15:26                   ` Dale [this message]
2011-07-29 18:14   ` [gentoo-user] " BRM
2011-07-29 19:35     ` Dale
2011-07-30 16:14     ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2011-08-01 16:46       ` BRM
2011-08-01 17:02         ` Michael Mol
2011-08-01 20:46         ` Grant Edwards

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E32D141.4090303@gmail.com \
    --to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox