From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Openoffice being replaced?
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:26:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E32D141.4090303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107291602.42293.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
Mick wrote:
> On Friday 29 Jul 2011 13:07:35 YoYo Siska wrote:
>
>
>>> Here is mine:
>>> Wed May 25 10:07:18 2011>>> app-office/libreoffice-3.3.2
>>>
>>> merge time: 34 minutes and 10 seconds.
>>>
>>> On my Intel Core i7 920 with 12GB of RAM using tmpfs. :)
>>>
>>> Do those merge times include download time? I wonder...
>>>
>> BTW, I was emerging libreoofice yesterday, and it took ~3.5 hours,
>> although OOo usually took ~1 hour. It seemed as if it wasn't doing
>> anything paralell, so I blamed my MAKEOPTS="-j -l4" (to which I changed
>> some time ago, but all the OOo compiles were before that). I just tried
>> today again with MAKEOPTS=-j4 and it took only ~1 hour ;).
>> Guess dmake doesn't know the --load-average stuff ;)
>>
> Hmm, OOo has failed many a time here with -j9. So now I always emerge it with
> -j1.
>
I been emerging with -j5 for ages. I haven't had any problems with that
before. I have read about others having it but just not me. That is
the weird part.
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-29 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-28 14:13 [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced? Dale
2011-07-28 14:41 ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 14:50 ` Dale
2011-07-28 14:55 ` skiarxon
2011-07-28 14:56 ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 15:31 ` Mick
2011-07-28 15:36 ` Kfir Lavi
2011-07-28 15:45 ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 16:00 ` Mick
2011-07-28 16:12 ` Tanstaafl
2011-07-28 16:54 ` Dale
2011-07-29 1:41 ` Bill Kenworthy
2011-07-28 18:45 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2011-07-28 20:08 ` Dale
2011-07-28 20:25 ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 20:48 ` Dale
2011-07-28 21:02 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-07-28 21:15 ` Alex Schuster
2011-07-28 21:24 ` Dale
2011-07-28 21:29 ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-28 22:37 ` Alex Schuster
2011-07-28 23:17 ` Dale
2011-07-29 13:51 ` Alex Schuster
2011-07-29 20:17 ` Dale
2011-07-29 12:07 ` YoYo Siska
2011-07-29 15:02 ` Mick
2011-07-29 15:26 ` Dale [this message]
2011-07-29 18:14 ` [gentoo-user] " BRM
2011-07-29 19:35 ` Dale
2011-07-30 16:14 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2011-08-01 16:46 ` BRM
2011-08-01 17:02 ` Michael Mol
2011-08-01 20:46 ` Grant Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E32D141.4090303@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox