From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QgPaz-0004ij-DS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:08:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8A2A21C08B for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6F321C08F for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so2376583gwj.40 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:30:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=COIC4/J2slKTHY8/ATrjtpo+2AGJxsMJvoF9sTMPT3c=; b=qOCIHx/j5GGiC+7ZPX7jUV+9Dkzw+nmXwLKL1Y5WM9dFSi0uMm7CRihbcr+oBefuJH fUNI0bL6Z/yq+vWV/zaLxiJTyNpWpXcCFejegrvM8GNtO9+yEHjaZbHYEOY8hzyQ0DEV IWrtFIZaLQV7Hro5AS0ZxuJ5NaoBpsj0BxkWU= Received: by 10.150.14.3 with SMTP id 3mr4476518ybn.121.1310423443201; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:30:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-57-83.jan.bellsouth.net [74.240.57.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z28sm3837077yhn.21.2011.07.11.15.30.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E1B7990.2010407@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:30:40 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110708 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics. References: <4E11EEF3.70804@gmail.com> <4E168B0E.2070100@gmail.com> <201107080702.58452.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4E16B251.6080204@gmail.com> <4E16B548.5050105@gmail.com> <4E17B3C3.4010009@gmail.com> <4E187F60.9080400@gmail.com> <4E18ABC3.1090909@orlitzky.com> <4E18C082.4070209@gmail.com> <4E18C977.9070001@orlitzky.com> <4E18D5A7.8040309@gmail.com> <4E1971AA.20209@coolmail.se> <4E1A00BA.5090306@gmail.com> <20110710230550.3e7c9060@digimed.co.uk> <4E1A4374.2090707@gmail.com> <4E1A8420.1050908@gmail.com> <20110711144538.24aceaab@digimed.co.uk> <4E1B05F8.7020401@orlitzky.com> <20110711220056.0ff0bdef@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: df9d4de698fb1a6facd3f5d40d172cb4 Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > >> >>>> No! It is not the latest. It's just what portage is offering you. The >>>> link I sent you clearly (!?) stated that you need to be running the >>>> latest 'Certified' driver revision 275.09.07 to get this fix. Just >>>> because the Gentoo devs haven't marked it as stable does (to me) mean >>>> that I should take their word for it. >>>> >> If Nvidia say to use the later version because they know the current >> arch version is broken, you should follow their advice and not ignore it >> simply because of a keyword setting in the ebuild. >> >> >> -- >> Neil Bothwick >> > And of course I would screw up my response by writing > > [QUOTE] > Just because the Gentoo devs haven't marked it as stable > does (to me) mean that I should take their word for it. > [/QUOTE] > > instead of what I meant, which would have been > > [SUBSTITUTE] > Just because the Gentoo devs haven't marked it as stable > ***DOESN'T*** (to me) mean that I should take their word for it. > [/SUBSTITUTE] > > Sorry! > > - Mark > > WOW !!! I'm not the only one that leaves out the word NOT. Funny how that three letter word can change the meaning of a sentence so much. It seems to turn things on its head so to speak. ;-) Dale :-) :-)