From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf3Kd-0001eZ-9n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 05:10:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C429621C077 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 05:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E7CE0458 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 04:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyf40 with SMTP id 40so1892654iyf.40 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:42:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=hRqCS4RmbJ9rWEx1OrvO9zB07/PAtgtm49cwycJwD+g=; b=cDJ2pDwRdfIcga2nG6fmL/IzdouB9XruEZzGV+HuMUQn5l2zlooZQuOZQF+AEvMxgV 6zQ2NKNvCV4eEHMgqVmfORQMoCVsuCCzQtm+w0XoAd3JxQO1WI6/mPNXzN1006TLsTi+ cHJSo7lkJa54ZbyyBBe9o/2atPGPjiWFBYOFw= Received: by 10.42.151.202 with SMTP id f10mr1680872icw.319.1310100134707; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.66] ([122.234.71.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hw7sm10522919icc.15.2011.07.07.21.42.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Jul 2011 21:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: microcai Message-ID: <4E168AA3.1080709@fedoraproject.org> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:42:11 +0800 From: =?UTF-8?B?5b6u6I+c?= Organization: fedoraproject.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110703 Thunderbird/5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it? References: <5098158.chQrAVvWtm@nazgul> <4E15F000.7040806@orlitzky.com> <4221035.bOF7vk8orf@nazgul> <4E1610A5.2070506@orlitzky.com> In-Reply-To: <4E1610A5.2070506@orlitzky.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9A8A99487262ADDAE5B90E9A" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a7177354a1c8125837ad886079a8734b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9A8A99487262ADDAE5B90E9A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011=E5=B9=B407=E6=9C=8808=E6=97=A5 04:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 07/07/11 15:36, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> And what about gnome? Does that not impose a fantastic testing burden,= =20 >> alongside which gnome-mplayer is small in comparison? >=20 > Yes, but the value of one's time isn't relative. If you'll allow me to > make up the numbers, just because it takes a month of time to test Gnom= e > doesn't mean that the day it would take to test gnome-mplayer is any > less valuable. In those eight hours you can still drink the same number= > of beers, read the same number of books, or -- hell, in this case -- fi= x > the same number of bugs in other packages. The time when you reply this message, you've already done that test >=20 >=20 >> How about the devs relook at this and do it sanely. When the major=20 >> consumer of gtk+ (gnome itself) has a stable gtk+-3 very in stable,=20 >> then other packages follow suit, not before. >=20 > I don't think anyone would disagree that this is nice to have; you just= > have to find someone to do the work. Writing ebuilds is fun, setting up= > test environments and recompiling all day is not. >=20 --------------enig9A8A99487262ADDAE5B90E9A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOFoqpAAoJEKT4Uz7oTANZqg4IAK3Qu6QiQPEQRkshsk6igue2 1Pejb9SGr1ZeL7UP2MKeHFClbq3AFKIBfpAH3TDebOSdxoPWWvRuoIDK1wQViixc M6/fyuUID/X2WA+7CCyCSpwASxF3sdJnlxPmkCJimaBo4f1CE/kK8OWThZYC0i2O jsEc6HfGIlL56Er79x6C6H5b2oswQ4IUU0FVblnqVlAMCiyO27njySTTcFg0imT1 qAWnp7w/RemWrya2l+9R7WlLmh4PK/H+n+ZRcJdnvnR+G3mbOxA2uqE8IWKwjmSh 8zdX0rUZThyxiH7IRQTfCFyW++rTMT93pL/2P9gZSiqc4wG4XvOkW/nfN1xe8hQ= =ugFd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9A8A99487262ADDAE5B90E9A--