From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QebCW-0004HY-Tl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:08:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D407621C1A8; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74BB21C1A3 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywm21 with SMTP id 21so229069ywm.40 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:06:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TDtOzmb8mzYg4r/1ssVO+8yHHC1zL1UB9KFhGCci+kw=; b=IqLLoEkxSWN2JvljbX/XAxLgJdkr5dZunbUKWA31Kk7IS+NVgBWP+JScMgFyoHf7hb cr1nIEjEDrr/l6AZKsKAV2r2lPR2mBZ+vKRqFyiMvw20ivWCrFeVu4gILwPVzhV/p6YV F8dOH1t8ou/cvu2lqEwykUm5vk2too+IIYkZ4= Received: by 10.90.249.5 with SMTP id w5mr391006agh.40.1309993594119; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-129-33.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.129.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e14sm5798299anm.20.2011.07.06.16.06.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E14EA77.8090503@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:06:31 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110705 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo wiping out Gtk 2 support from packages that support it? References: <4E14BF3B.8020607@coolmail.se> <6151119.rLbBTuJhbN@nazgul> <20821970.rXlNJucr0u@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20821970.rXlNJucr0u@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b1cff59017972358481fae0a69c05211 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > and/or take the whole mess to -dev... > > I couldn't care less about gtk stuff - but forcing gtk3 just because - and > that on a package where gtk3 is the worse choice... not a smart move. > > This sounds like the move KDE made with KDE4. I have some gtk stuff on here but I'm not sure how much I actually use it. The new version may be good one day but if it is not ready yet, why not wait until it is? I dunno. Deja vu ? That spelled right? Dale :-) :-)