[gentoo-user] portage for chef-0.10.0

[gentoo-user] portage for chef-0.10.0

[Alexey Melezhik]

Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to  
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version 0.10.0  
of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client, version  
0.10.0 will be ready?

Thank you.

-- 
Alexey Melezhik

Re: [gentoo-user] portage for chef-0.10.0

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:00:46 +0400, Alexey Melezhik wrote:

> Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to  
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version
> 0.10.0 of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client,
> version 0.10.0 will be ready?

Bugzilla is the place to ask this, in this case at 

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369391


-- 
Neil Bothwick

If at first you don't succeed, well...darn.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] portage for chef-0.10.0

[Jesús J. Guerrero Botella]

2011/6/28 Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk>:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:00:46 +0400, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
>
>> Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version
>> 0.10.0 of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client,
>> version 0.10.0 will be ready?
>
> Bugzilla is the place to ask this, in this case at
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369391

Sometimes the problem is that there's not enough dev power, or that
there's no developer interested in maintaining that concrete package.

In any case, submitting an updated ebuild to bugzilla sometimes can
help to speed up the process.


-- 
Jesús Guerrero Botella

Re: [gentoo-user] portage for chef-0.10.0

[Alexey Melezhik]

Ok thank you!

Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 28 Jun  
2011 18:03:12 +0400:

> On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:00:46 +0400, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
>
>> Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version
>> 0.10.0 of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client,
>> version 0.10.0 will be ready?
>
> Bugzilla is the place to ask this, in this case at
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369391
>
>

Re: [gentoo-user] portage for chef-0.10.0

[kashani]

On 6/28/2011 5:00 AM, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
> Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version 0.10.0
> of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client, version
> 0.10.0 will be ready?
>
> Thank you.
>

	As the others have pointed out it's coming, but in the short term you 
can always gem install directly and continue to use the init scripts 
that shipped with the portage package. I do the same on Ubuntu w/ Puppet.

kashani

Re: [gentoo-user] portage for chef-0.10.0

[Alexey Melezhik]

yeah, gem is okay, but portage is more proper way for our admins (((:

kashani <kashani-list@badapple.net> писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 28 Jun  
2011 20:33:07 +0400:

> On 6/28/2011 5:00 AM, Alexey Melezhik wrote:
>> Current chef-client portage is only for version 0.9.12 (according to
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-admin/chef), while version 0.10.0
>> of chef was released at May, 02. When portage for chef-client, version
>> 0.10.0 will be ready?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>
> 	As the others have pointed out it's coming, but in the short term you  
> can always gem install directly and continue to use the init scripts  
> that shipped with the portage package. I do the same on Ubuntu w/ Puppet.
>
> kashani
>