From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QavZV-0002bj-P1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:04:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5E531C1B1; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB801C1B1 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so5168504iwn.40 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:01:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OETdNtl2KQxyqyxmZ2xxVFD5fjRPtaOxLiVwzRfAZH4=; b=SfbkGKFajm5ekA16QRpJqOQhXLrWJeJeMq9d0HLc/e7zReFBDxEXT0tgskjE15TgwW pq2uLWRjg726h7TUlbDYdWQq2Y95VDMvqXZtydP0JbFA71Inje/P5Vhl5GTu2jgZTsjD UZcCoESKfnBscmlS26ZXVJdPPDd5SVz3ihelI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=w0XAr37/60Cz0UC3nmnxwVGUkX7m4qPVc7Y7l0fa4BXIVEhtWz+qDD52XVSIRy4dwi TokI9Jb9Zd2AgITrazIHm87MFnSUBIX7Vk5y6VoYd9eeI4TcN1gw1L5BBMzCe99PLsUi uyxLoNLso9/ycoIUi5Xxq2TvQMd4+RUOJT4xU= Received: by 10.42.148.132 with SMTP id r4mr5938001icv.159.1309118483195; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:01:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-120-31.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.120.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ly7sm4681163icb.0.2011.06.26.13.01.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E07900F.701@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:01:19 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <3693085.ofv3n58up4@pc> <4E07502F.6040807@gmail.com> <1356628.dAT3mRUGLW@pc> In-Reply-To: <1356628.dAT3mRUGLW@pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9329619cfac778d858ac53dfd91849fc Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2011, 10:28:47 schrieb Dale: > >> Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: >> >>> Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:58:56 schrieb Peter Humphrey: >>> >>>> Whether "many" operations are written in Fortran is immaterial. What >>>> matters to me is whether any on my system are. If they aren't, I >>>> don't need a Fortran compiler and I'd rather not waste system >>>> resources on building one. >>>> >>> Try euse -I fortran. >>> If anything besides gcc pops up, you should have one. >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael >>> >> That doesn't appear to work like it should then. I get this: >> >> root@fireball / # euse -I fortran >> global use flags (searching: fortran) >> ************************************************************ >> [+ CD ] fortran - Adds support for fortran (formerly f77) >> >> Installed packages matching this USE flag: >> sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5 >> >> local use flags (searching: fortran) >> ************************************************************ >> no matching entries found >> root@fireball / # >> >> Thing is, I know a couple packages use it on this rig because I just had >> to recompile them. Cantor and R are two that I recall. >> >> Maybe it is because it is not a option in the list? The USE flag that is. >> > Iirc you had problems with -fortran, because you have packages that really > need fortran. My suggestion was for people like Peter, who have no problems > without fortran. It shows only packages which could perform better, if a > fortran compiler is available and otherwise fallback to a C implementation. At > least, I think it does :) > > >> Dale >> :-) :-) >> > Michael > > Thing is, I switched it back and programs on here now need fortran to build. So, euse is not reporting it but R and Cantor won't build without fortran. Basically, euse should also report R and cantor but it isn't. If mine isn't reporting that, then Peter's may not either. Dale :-) :-)