From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qalel-0007OH-BG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:29:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7741A1C053; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E0F1C053 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyf40 with SMTP id 40so4820503iyf.40 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:27:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dIhibmB4UKMaKhmYqRFzA1iXcB5TLJfBf27EMxwoPpA=; b=NWLwxqdJbCQH/N0aarYw55H+I6GSorkMjS74revCqKlnS2YLZ0GkED6IjsUEx1L8I/ bLUav9czCVUKkYymieXH9hFmOT9s1nILw3b81n8YFtj/iW7krdu9jjdOY+2Tp22/vsGY UwXqRT+pchvQU90milb7PrF/sFp6d7JANhccA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AbTcNi2XTJldaIAsUvr7ZfWlfevfDyK832Urg5wsRLLNVOwHjb3ze3q8Et6q1tAjsF Cmy+Z1oYmligg5QfYhfZcYQvqx0Tg2YFjYU5SocUqvDmboPCTafHT+Ru8Ga+85yiJyTX Zos7G3BQWODkDKehJKU04M5qQC8lSpJ98T84A= Received: by 10.43.134.138 with SMTP id ic10mr3915981icc.31.1309080442567; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-120-31.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.120.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gb8sm2436002ibb.9.2011.06.26.02.27.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E06FB77.1080803@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 04:27:19 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E05CEDC.6060006@gmail.com> <4E05D8AB.10403@gentoo.org> <2211928.F2exzk2evu@nazgul> <4E063AF6.4090708@gmail.com> <1309055062.25671.22.camel@rattus> In-Reply-To: <1309055062.25671.22.camel@rattus> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: f713e058c08e69c4b50be11656754544 William Kenworthy wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 14:45 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> >> What I like is the speed it got corrected. People that don't sync often >> most likely didn't even know it ever changed. >> >> > ... > > I got bit, on a 6 monthly major update across multiple systems - what > were the odds of that happening? > > Despite that, its small potatoes in the scheme of updating perl/python > and other major packages ... > > BillK > > Ummmmm. Ouch !! Well compiling gcc a couple times will give them a workout. ;-) Dale :-) :-)