From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QaRfO-0008C5-N6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:08:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 282D51C189; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12BC1C187 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyf40 with SMTP id 40so4176452iyf.40 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:04:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B88vEASdep1zz0PkamwZIaQPileOMKVgeCPfHRidfIw=; b=PB8+ZoMBSnWDUdneeH3Cq5tMfnIcbs0cXlglqZnO+fue0Kyev3dMtf0fgDJZOE2YAX Ojh8S3vO2YEn7ovgp1XNe52AR5n0TBv+W7EzSGG5IW93OnjwaBo1ZmsHP7AwRzpbI+eP Q3qTIN9sTWe4wqCIz+bWVs0263wWXyuFCMnqg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TTO0OSY3Q4HSnX2l43zTApnVB/IYR/eZJU06jh4fpUsMlgfIqJ2hrxXbb+bL8nto5y 4Wi/fhZ+2g1b1QsDHq5q1EZoguuyQOPkG9VpqxT+K1NOkDC+ClyJsSrDk+Cr1KdQ03LW QCE4uaIutgKAZzb8vLzN8p9/Lm7L2pLriyrbs= Received: by 10.231.207.170 with SMTP id fy42mr3995052ibb.36.1309003496937; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-120-31.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.120.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w11sm1973066ibw.24.2011.06.25.05.04.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 25 Jun 2011 05:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E05CEDC.6060006@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 07:04:44 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <6517863.YlIiSIDa8W@pc> <4E04ECE0.9010109@gmail.com> <1466587.PvB50u6JAg@pc> <4E04F91C.8070902@gmail.com> <20110624232018.03c2a706@digimed.co.uk> <4E055608.4060800@gmail.com> <20110625124829.3b9e05a8@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110625124829.3b9e05a8@digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4a4be5a4d40ea1098f534427da88e519 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:29:12 -0500, Dale wrote: > > >>>> I guess my first post was correct after all. Enable fortran USE flag >>>> and keep things as it was before it got changed. It was working >>>> fine. >>>> >>> Isn't that flag enabled by default? All you have yo do is not disable >>> it. >>> > >> You seem to have forgot the dev had changed it. Since it got noticed >> and all the dev changed it back in about a day or so. So, it was >> enabled, got disabled by a dev then got enabled again by the same dev. >> > ISTR reading some mention of that. Do you mean the profile was changed? > That sounds a bit naughty, changing a profile should be done on a version > bump IMO. > > > I don't know for sure where it was changed but the dev that did the change posted this: > We restructured the dependency chain for fortran support, which includes > a compile test now. The failure can be seen above. > > The Problem was in short, USE=fortran was enabled by default for linux > arches, but people tend to disable it. Depending on gcc[fortran] doesn't > work completely as gcc:4.4[fortran] and gcc:4.5[-fortran] with gcc-4.5 > select can be installed, which would full fill the dependency but > nevertheless doesn't give a working compiler. > > So now packages depend on virtual/fortran and use an eclass to check for > a working compiler. So if you see this message, this means you somehow > worked around gcc[fortran]. > > > justin > That make sense? Dale :-) :-)