From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QaJbe-0007IP-OI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:32:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D367E1C013; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D1C1C013 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyf40 with SMTP id 40so3923226iyf.40 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:29:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NkXxKcCoKU7lAo/VIPFL2AGS+R/G8v5TT7gLNdPMogY=; b=JPEbCuWp78aEC2NbDge6vMwLX6h26tefK05rgwbLzfblSYzmpd4MVQ/zxLYZdv4hoe NHE1cUYrnFjNeUQfzxUzHGfHSjEZGeISQnIiM6ySXVes7s2z8khsJKO7kne3FsJ1Ssc2 QlXfXq8aXYstt1yihQ+Ur0BpHTHw1BvMVU4wo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QFG8vve7HxxuNppncWnv2QVvOSZkMEBP1KFRVD0U7xUdEoL3wGLKXtHGmeKTB6s8mL scxBLW3nGpN919m5bKTlTlt1UHGTvhV52xTJOxeUrVHY8i90Df3NauVTGbTWUQYQAscw kD8jjw3pDYbzbu+npbi3mJCC2o7o+XGpUFn4o= Received: by 10.42.222.2 with SMTP id ie2mr4315944icb.303.1308972555740; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:29:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-120-31.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.120.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ly7sm3217768icb.0.2011.06.24.20.29.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E055608.4060800@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:29:12 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <6517863.YlIiSIDa8W@pc> <4E04ECE0.9010109@gmail.com> <1466587.PvB50u6JAg@pc> <4E04F91C.8070902@gmail.com> <20110624232018.03c2a706@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110624232018.03c2a706@digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: c0a5c8dda449643170af08f218f18c7c Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:52:44 -0500, Dale wrote: > > >> I guess my first post was correct after all. Enable fortran USE flag >> and keep things as it was before it got changed. It was working fine. >> > Isn't that flag enabled by default? All you have yo do is not disable it. > > > You seem to have forgot the dev had changed it. Since it got noticed and all the dev changed it back in about a day or so. So, it was enabled, got disabled by a dev then got enabled again by the same dev. That was the reason this whole thread started to begin with, to alert people that a USE flag got disabled and SOME of us need to enable it again if we want things to stay the same. Dale :-) :-)