From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qa6G0-0003Fd-SM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:17:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 990211C011; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.alltele.net (m1.alltele.net [85.30.0.4]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FFE1C011 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([87.227.57.71]) by smtp.alltele.net (IceWarp 10.3.1 RC1) with ESMTP id HTM29712 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:14:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4E048DA5.6060609@coolmail.se> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:14:13 +0200 From: pk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110510 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E0376AE.3080905@coolmail.se> <20110623191608.1696dbc1@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <2041231.8YkDbPZmLp@nazgul> <4E045060.9020706@coolmail.se> <20110624103126.04ef49d5@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20110624103126.04ef49d5@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.27 required=7.00 tests=LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.56,RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC=1.00,MR_NOT_ATTRIBUTED_IP=0.20,SMILEY=-0.50,NO_RDNS2=0.01,MR_DIFF_MID=1.00 version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (1.1) on smtp.alltele.net X-CTCH: RefID="str=0001.0A0B020C.4E048DA5.008B,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0"; Spam="Unknown"; VOD="Unknown" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 1f13e0cc47faaf64a23991c412b5cd74 On 2011-06-24 11:31, Neil Bothwick wrote: > To both of you, let me introduce you to the concept of sarcasm... Oh well... I'm not entirely unfamiliar with that concept, although I admit that it escaped me this time. Perhaps, it has something to do with how it was presented? ;-) Best regards Peter K