From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZt5w-00051C-HV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:13:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38AF81C045; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDAE1C045 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so2644894iwn.40 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:05:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1DK5Za05FWIMlpxDva+thbRFv1XqH4n2sA5yGVMfOoE=; b=ULPXoDfgreFP+3yEfzSr1kiG7IiK+ESJOT1NlYMLRuP3VPN+Y5klJaAyhLvqhS6Fe1 KwwIpLNRWa2c0JYJ99ckeHUJFoXMZonCEyReVQLQRWjQqZebE1R1ueel6dr5gI5fmftV wmJeQP0/YUHKOVovpapnGNlacczYsGcabBrG0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xY8HIJjWQjyvJvPAqL6sv9CPwt1vI+5Dw6jHGzfEzVI3q2mpYDpCSo8HD2XpnAQepg Z3+XNGKQq/k4/z1PGJ7CkRpkdcMIQ5Rp8b/heHj9z33/yF/8iqXU9ROVAzZsE6SA7GY0 pDyV3jXzAShS2+cDA11Whv2kH2tUY1ngel34c= Received: by 10.231.19.201 with SMTP id c9mr2063673ibb.188.1308870345235; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-120-31.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.120.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s2sm1127805ibe.52.2011.06.23.16.05.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:05:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E03C6C6.1000106@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:05:42 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <20110622212816.GB20163@ns1.bonedaddy.net> <4E026E39.6040802@gmail.com> <201106232330.04283.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> In-Reply-To: <201106232330.04283.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 805f06cd54cfc89f6d1f9ee3ed243f39 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 22 June 2011 23:35:37 Dale wrote: > > >> Maybe we have something different then. I don't have blas-reference on >> here anymore either. My point was, disabling fortran to remove it only >> lead to other stuff being required. I think there is more on here now >> than there was before. So, removing fortran to get rid of bloat didn't >> help any because it just required a different set of bloat. >> > Maybe it's time to make a backup, then remove all USE flags from make.conf > and package.use, set your profile to default/linux//10.0/desktop/kde > and rebuild. Alan and Neil's idea of a set of the meta-packages you want > sounds good to me too. > > Then you'll really have a clean system. > > I may follow suit - I built this system with kde-meta for simplicity, but of > course it now has a lot of stuff I don't want, including Fortran. I tried > rebuilding with -fortran as I said a few minutes ago, but portage wanted ifc > instead. > > Yep. On my machine, it pulled in about a dozen or so new packages to replace R and fortran being disabled on gcc. I'm not sure I made my system any leaner or cleaner. I actually may have done the opposite. Dale :-) :-)