From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZVyS-0004vK-JP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:32:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 01B4C1C03D; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yi0-f53.google.com (mail-yi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFAC1C03D for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yic15 with SMTP id 15so795271yic.40 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:31:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TxAP3Xl5vEdTexCxpJeJrGvDxbIUjY0uAG+zWKH2TKM=; b=mAX1nyvFTEjb5X0HS753Va5kTjgoiD6Fg4Q6Xv4Lapn9gUUU8KlqisriGTVWq60SHN p46ivSbUqYImj6W9uF/HOwa1IpL5yG9Lu0FIIBmOc4vAZ9jnr2WKTOXA0Sw6NirhYhJh 9DcEfsrzMoy7XQnQ0ux27FvGWm4/4kQ4Ed6Hs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fWyC4Q0UccbWXVASXdJApHqY2rgv0yx8y6hFzl8VKoXffPLqiBmqtgAxko/P01SvxN 9R4mN8Vq034YSljiNpSddMpqlWn35n9w9d0hoinUCgVbgJ9BXMJ0Ai2G15CpZSaSLNtM k6O923iJBUvmif/KdvaVOZ7cfoMDxztH2ORaY= Received: by 10.150.132.15 with SMTP id f15mr1471842ybd.388.1308781872226; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-109-99.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.109.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i26sm643313yhn.56.2011.06.22.15.31.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E026D2D.5070707@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:31:09 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E01CF99.1070109@gmail.com> <4E01EF3F.8040800@gmail.com> <4E020BA4.50201@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a9f5aef91447aa280c90de010bda6346 Mark Knecht wrote: > For kicks I decided to give -fortran a try. I find it interesting that > with Fortran installed using either the fortran flag in package.use, > or just not setting the flag at all, I apparently do not need the c++ > libraries that I do need when I choose -fortran. However it seems that > -fortran doesn't eliminate the need for installing a Fortran compiler. > It simply shifted it from the GNU gcc Fortran package to the Intel > Fortran Compiler (dev-lang/ifc) > > c2stable ~ # emerge -pvDuN @world > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild N ] sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6 USE="(multilib) nls" 23,459 kB > [ebuild N ] virtual/libstdc++-3.3 0 kB > [ebuild N ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat-20100611 > USE="(multilib)" 930 kB > [ebuild N ] dev-lang/ifc-10.0.026-r1 40,378 kB > [ebuild R ] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5 USE="gtk mudflap (multilib) nls > nptl openmp (-altivec) -bootstrap -build -doc (-fixed-point) -fortran* > -gcj -graphite (-hardened) (-libffi) -multislot -nocxx -nopie -nossp > -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -test -vanilla (-n32%) (-n64%)" 61,647 kB > > Total: 5 packages (4 new, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 126,413 kB > c2stable ~ # > > I have a virtual/fortran driven AFACT through any number of dependencies: > > c2stable ~ # eix -I fortran > [I] virtual/fortran > Available versions: 0 {openmp} > Installed versions: 0(06:12:54 AM 06/22/2011)(openmp) > Description: Virtual for Fortran Compiler > > c2stable ~ # eix -Ic fortran > [I] virtual/fortran (0@06/22/2011): Virtual for Fortran Compiler > c2stable ~ # equery depends fortran > * These packages depend on fortran: > dev-python/numpy-1.6.0 (lapack ? virtual/fortran) > sci-libs/blas-reference-20070226 (virtual/fortran) > c2stable ~ # equery depends numpy > * These packages depend on numpy: > dev-python/pygtk-2.22.0-r1 (dev-python/numpy) > c2stable ~ # equery depends pygtk > * These packages depend on pygtk: > dev-python/pygtksourceview-2.10.1 (>=dev-python/pygtk-2.8:2) > dev-python/twisted-11.0.0 (gtk ?>=dev-python/pygtk-1.99) > dev-vcs/git-1.7.3.4-r1 (gtk ?>=dev-python/pygtk-2.8) > x11-misc/driconf-0.9.1-r1 (>=dev-python/pygtk-2.4:2) > c2stable ~ # equery depends blas-reference > * These packages depend on blas-reference: > virtual/blas-1.0 (sci-libs/blas-reference) > c2stable ~ # equery depends virtual/blas > * These packages depend on virtual/blas: > dev-lang/R-2.12.2 (virtual/blas) > c2stable ~ # > > In my case I'm sticking with the gcc fortran package as it's the devil I know... > > - Mark > > > I emerge -C ifc and revdep-rebuild rebuilt some stuff but it is gone now. So, you may have to work with it but it *might* be removable too. Dale :-) :-)