From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZQzB-00051i-0W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:13:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C18DC1C197; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from darkmetatron.de (darkmetatron.de [85.214.105.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853281C197 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.126] (xdsl-78-34-180-22.netcologne.de [78.34.180.22]) by darkmetatron.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B512B53F006D for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:11:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E02223F.9090500@darkmetatron.de> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:11:27 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U2ViYXN0aWFuIEJlw59sZXI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110526 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage getting mixed up with USE? References: <2869451.8C6Z2vDv6d@nazgul> <1670223.3B9JZpE7Ee@nazgul> <20110622154440.0425dbe1@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <15413157.QhsxscBRlY@nazgul> In-Reply-To: <15413157.QhsxscBRlY@nazgul> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF11F13BEC4F2DF9F8EA972CB" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 1e8f413d6d6aa809b39157c72b200d93 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF11F13BEC4F2DF9F8EA972CB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 22.06.2011 17:31, schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On Wednesday 22 June 2011 15:44:40 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly: >> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:41:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> It is unset here (well, it's not set, actually - same thing) >> >> autounmask is set by default, you need to explicitly set it to off. >=20 > So, >=20 > is it invisibly on then? I don't have it in make.conf and it's not in=20 > FEATURES: It is not a FEATURE its a default option NOTE: This --autounmask behavior can be disabled by setting EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=3D"--autounmask=3Dn" in make.conf. Greetings Sebastian Be=C3=9Fler --------------enigF11F13BEC4F2DF9F8EA972CB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOAiJAAAoJEE2ZiVbqhmXcIzwP/jzt25h/GyMgCPEGEuHXiKRq 7YdT/hjwHeSa7DKVRLFr5sYz543WMpEqB/zcN1Pg8ROgl/0KdzaUnewFlbT60ppQ JVK4wcTkSYxTVk4yh0KnsI/xXeKGDeMDsheV5IsozIbg8lf4lOwTsFL1jP7nG2Zg iopJipDAaWepzDWt6V9kvEiTEkDfRNAS/eNRxf5b0bffaXHatLaX5eMIXeaEkt0W sbeST2gQhOk7+pHvjmjugyPNtpMVXfWfReV9LwgqM785zLD/9hE5M9IrAlqaZmvv 9H6UQNKvH6dJdj7nk3mfKyQYeANeliHogUvQpFBH21ow+F42QiHhjObi3F4e0gK2 TLKNvPFsb1h0/4PDbGaqb15+rD/eC76rrik+3ej+nwmUV5tFd+fMhk2EcCbWZQ7V 4xxGmm4WRLDem5V99uWQ8tK4t4cTR3ZksDPmFUcxerrpiHAAOIwYmx5QnSO1SfPR aLThhjEKtroLKUNv/wKywywQAD+ZC8kW3h9NeC5tp6fRapUcOUs7Ji1xGzKsCz3s T/m9qLqU3IsHBL7CvtBSRNWTShLhL89XbBW/FScUihYUfLsYntlKPgL3VBUCX5g4 N+mop/6cN6XP19wdsNJ+Gr0t/NrXGMdYwg/ZYJjVJrBFFTlVutvCTUAF3iuSxpIm a2C9TbcCzdAkYSNWsAoq =1OC/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF11F13BEC4F2DF9F8EA972CB--