From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZQNj-0001EF-AH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:34:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 289E51C292; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from darkmetatron.de (darkmetatron.de [85.214.105.42]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43EB1C292 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.126] (xdsl-78-34-180-22.netcologne.de [78.34.180.22]) by darkmetatron.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F04C953F006C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:30:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E02189A.90908@darkmetatron.de> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:30:18 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U2ViYXN0aWFuIEJlw59sZXI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110526 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage getting mixed up with USE? References: <2869451.8C6Z2vDv6d@nazgul> <1670223.3B9JZpE7Ee@nazgul> <20110622154440.0425dbe1@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> <15413157.QhsxscBRlY@nazgul> In-Reply-To: <15413157.QhsxscBRlY@nazgul> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3F3B4C933B372FDC2B0EAA7E" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 349fdf8fc2d7539defde497f39e8f33a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3F3B4C933B372FDC2B0EAA7E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 22.06.2011 17:31, schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On Wednesday 22 June 2011 15:44:40 Neil Bothwick did opine thusly: >> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:41:57 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> It is unset here (well, it's not set, actually - same thing) >> >> autounmask is set by default, you need to explicitly set it to off. >=20 > So, >=20 > is it invisibly on then? I don't have it in make.conf and it's not in=20 > FEATURES: It is not a FEATURE its a default option NOTE: This --autounmask behavior can be disabled by setting EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=3D"--autounmask=3Dn" in make.conf. Greetings Sebastian Be=C3=9Fler --------------enig3F3B4C933B372FDC2B0EAA7E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOAhinAAoJEE2ZiVbqhmXcKggQAKVrZgFPcNqO2ykXUtyVlb3Z CjCEaU7U4h36pRD7pV9wdNMA+wrK7wWrmlmu5e6l7tFDWtNWlc7pr50xTv4aMDat AAAfB+nrgaP/MrBd8dx5YCszYSiaOqiYQ+rcdef4MYn10HgYk4unKgl9A08Y3pGT 0FthFTeaYnvMkoqDxAwi3sNmvodNt+Pc+/6yHCuvHpIeQNOwswvgCi7ly4OvOPa7 Hd6NTjyiTZYuSY70vS6d+ot1NIyGycpnlD5fJHFOneG2v7R1ggRpUHfoG1pRwv9n hpBSwpoSH5JLPD4Rl4frkYBS6pb3xbVAT7DHKxGkzioEQocPcA7p8nLYVb8tpDFl GyMAkHbvtNT3kdUqmrcOzdPogn+2MeszpAqjp5liLP6GyHSgoXKa6Lb+3VqwmDfJ LNXBn4x1B+9lC9oablghCe6f87EILJ45NUrlGlElweNFS94/E6nzbg7/RaVs9qDn eS390P8cShpAlFr7YnoUeN+6PAyBDXpQoZt27x0B0Wi+ejlwvoK8+WTz03kiB16f FQDtpqKh6moOp2xuvgcJs8wlEqckWBVKZCVWnoCbgJAfVJbB3Y4OTWGEuy3ovm8G 1fCcdYfG4ogRQsll1eaLj/Vrbjhs3U5eCDvUeQ7w+jtm3LLQiD0kND1jOOth78r3 1o7swv39XqUB370AjpUo =Bh6s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3F3B4C933B372FDC2B0EAA7E--