Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now?

[Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>]

Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> If eix-test-obsolete is outputting waaaay too much there there's an
> opportunity there for you to clean things up, if not today then over
> time. Once you get it right it outputs almost nothing.
>
> Note that I run stable and then use ~amd64 in package.keywords rather
> liberally where I currently have 20-30 testing packages selected.
>
> I haven't cleaned anything up in months.
>
> - Mark
>
> c2stable ~ # eix-test-obsolete -d
>
> No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.keywords.
> No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords.
> No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.mask.
> No non-matching entries in /etc/portage/package.unmask.
> No non-matching or empty entries in /etc/portage/package.use.
> No non-matching or empty entries in /etc/portage/package.env.
> No non-matching or empty entries in /etc/portage/package.cflags.
> The names of all installed packages are in the database.
>
>
> Redundant in /etc/portage/package.{,accept_}keywords:
>
> ... considered as REDUNDANT_IF_STRANGE
> [I] sys-apps/portage (2.2.0_alpha41@06/15/2011): Portage is the
> package management and distribution system for Gentoo
>
> No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.{,accept_}keywords
> No  redundant  entries in /etc/portage/package.mask
> No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.mask
> No  redundant  entries in /etc/portage/package.unmask
> No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.unmask
> No  redundant  entries in /etc/portage/package.use
> No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.use
> No  redundant  entries in /etc/portage/package.env
> No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.env
> No  redundant  entries in /etc/portage/package.cflags
> No uninstalled entries in /etc/portage/package.cflags
>
> Installed packages with a version not in the database (or masked):
> [D] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources (2.6.38-r1(2.6.38-r1)@03/30/2011
> 2.6.38-r3(2.6.38-r3)@04/24/2011 2.6.38-r4(2.6.38-r4)@05/04/2011
> 2.6.38-r5(2.6.38-r5)@05/11/2011 2.6.39(2.6.39)@05/30/2011
> 2.6.39-r1(2.6.39-r1)@06/11/2011 ->  2.6.32-r24(2.6.32-r24)!b!s
> 2.6.32-r29(2.6.32-r29)!b!s (~)2.6.32-r30(2.6.32-r30)!b!s
> (~)2.6.32-r31(2.6.32-r31)!b!s 2.6.35-r15(2.6.35-r15)!b!s
> 2.6.36-r8(2.6.36-r8)!b!s (~)2.6.37-r3(2.6.37-r3)!b!s
> 2.6.37-r4(2.6.37-r4)!b!s (~)2.6.37-r5(2.6.37-r5)!b!s
> (~)2.6.37-r6(2.6.37-r6)!b!s (~)2.6.38-r4(2.6.38-r4)!b!s
> (~)2.6.38-r5(2.6.38-r5)!b!s 2.6.38-r6(2.6.38-r6)!b!s
> (~)2.6.38-r7(2.6.38-r7)!b!s (~)2.6.39(2.6.39)!b!s
> (~)2.6.39-r1(2.6.39-r1)!b!s): Full sources including the Gentoo
> patchset for the 2.6 kernel tree
>
> c2stable ~ #
>
>    

Time is the problem right now.  I got about 50 mater plants, 15 
eggplants, about 100 pepper plants of different kinds, three rows of 
okra, two rows of peas, and just planted three rows of snap beans, 16 
hills of squash, 5 cucumber hills, 5 cantaloupe hills, and a few others 
that I forget.  Did I mention I have nutgrass?  I make rounds every day 
for that.  THAT is some work.  Since it just rained, it will be popping 
up real good now.  This next week will be so much fun. < roll eyes >

I did have a time that it returned nothing.  It took me several days to 
get there tho.  Right now, I don't see that happening.  What would be 
nice is if portage would print a little message when a USE flag goes 
away.  It does a good job of letting us know when one is missing.  It's 
half way there now.  lol

Short version since it is sooooooo long:

root@fireball / # eix-test-obsolete -d | grep Found
Found 19 matches.
Found 8 matches.
Found 41 matches.
Found 2 matches.
Found 28 matches.
Found 354 matches.
Found 4 matches.
Found 27 matches.
root@fireball / #

354 !!  That could take a while.  O_O   Maybe start on the small ones 
first.

Dale

:-)  :-)