From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZNaN-0008Bg-OP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:35:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D95B31C170; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABD31C170 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so477893gwj.40 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:33:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BAy68aCag9e9fKOV+0T1CS5LtimNJ3m6trJlaLWXL+k=; b=Ca73YmhTaj5LSR47eZVrUCCnSnZRQV4MDmdgFwqNE+fqX8Rn6L7zT3rRSNSK6ynGJ8 GcuQv0fdGUTIzgUV1i1boPNmEDSdySlN2HdWV8TV+XNmsX9prxWFy2MM/WGH0zQztX6t rbSCiehnqdgaHGH9/Yb3a81ACIDMXdrwSSeJI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YBDvev/iwHWOpsmVfDk7oEK9vgOtgRbea8zAbZshDdDFRXt6cMiSoYNkagzeIY3zZP HvBfA0exLc0Ot5o5ky82SKDEDXFtDIYb/NJWWzM627Q5ZFYK3bput/3RS13I+qCUId0N C00K/l/odaJCUFjwwmmxJtcDRiBiC3nC2pgqM= Received: by 10.236.176.98 with SMTP id a62mr1166243yhm.349.1308749634162; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:33:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-109-99.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.109.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i61sm308066yhe.47.2011.06.22.06.33.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E01EF3F.8040800@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:33:51 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110606 Gentoo/2.0.14-r1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? References: <4E0167C4.9080100@gmail.com> <4E01CF99.1070109@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 9375e8da60741e9dce76612ea7acd4fd Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 06/22/2011 02:18 PM, Dale wrote: >> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> On 06/22/2011 06:55 AM, Dale wrote: >>>> I just did my updates and ran into this: >>>> >>>> * Maintainer: sci@gentoo.org >>>> * USE: amd64 consolekit elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib policykit >>>> userland_GNU >>>> * FEATURES: preserve-libs sandbox >>>> >>>> * Please install currently selected gcc version with USE=fortran. >>>> * If you intend to use a different compiler then gfortran, please >>>> * set FC variable accordingly and take care that the neccessary >>>> * fortran dialects are support. >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> Heads up for folks about to do their updates, check into the USE flag >>>> fortran to see if you need to add it to yours before updating a >>>> bunch of >>>> stuff. >>> >>> Uninstall sci-libs/blas-reference I guess. And probably whatever >>> depends on it. Please do an "emerge -pv --depclean blas-reference" and >>> post the output so we can see what's pulling it as a dep on your >>> system. >>> >> >> Here is the output: >> >> root@fireball / # emerge -pv --depclean blas-reference >> >> Calculating dependencies... done! >> sci-libs/blas-reference-20070226 pulled in by: >> virtual/blas-1.0 > > OK, that didn't help. Try: emerge -pv --depclean virtual/blas > > Here you go: root@fireball / # emerge -pv --depclean virtual/blas Calculating dependencies... done! virtual/blas-1.0 pulled in by: dev-lang/R-2.10.1 >>> No packages selected for removal by depclean Packages installed: 989 Packages in world: 119 Packages in system: 51 Required packages: 989 Number to remove: 0 root@fireball / # >> Two things. I read about this on -dev but didn't realize it was going to >> affect me until I saw the message. After I added fortran to my USE line >> in make.conf, it only rebuilt gcc then revdep-rebuild rebuilt >> dev-lang/ifc-10.0.026-r1. Everything appears to be clean now. >> >> To think people wonder why my USE line is so big. I keep having to add >> stuff when portage pukes but portage never tells me when one has fell >> off the reservation and needs to be removed. < sighs > Over the years, >> it adds up. > > That is no solution. I highly doubt you need a Fortran compiler :-/ > By adding more stuff to your make.conf as a work-around for problems > like this, you add more and more stuff to your Gentoo install; stuff > you actually have zero use for. By that logic, you could enable every > possible USE flag that exists so that you always have everything, just > in case. But then you should probably be using openSUSE or something :-P > > > Well, it appeared to only affect gcc here. We all know I have to have that. lol Do you really want me to send you my USE line in make.conf? I copied it from my old install on another rig and it has been added to ever since oh about 2003. It has some size to it. Keep in mind, they didn't have package.use for a long time too. I really need to clean out some stuff but want to have time to finish it when I start. I don't have that sort of time during garden season. I need food more than I need a puter. ;-) Dale :-) :-)